1999
DOI: 10.1159/000010064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacrospinous Fixation for the Prolapsed Vaginal Vault

Abstract: In 54 patients, transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures were reviewed retrospectively. The mean operation time was 15 (12–45) min. The mean blood loss was 126 (110–175) cm3. The only intraoperative complication was a rectal laceration that was repaired primarily. The mean duration of follow-up was 28 (4–54) months. There were only 2 recurrent vaginal vault prolapses. There were 3 cases of cystocele (5.5%), 1 case of rectocele (1.8%), 5 cases of enterocele (9.2%), 3 cases of stress inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For uterus- sparing prolapse repair, apart from AHSP, other abdominal procedures have been described including combined vaginal-abdominal retropubic uterine suspension, pectineal ligament uterine suspension and hysterosacropexy [22,23]. Vaginal procedures have also been described to result in satisfactory outcomes [24][25][26][27][28]. As in the case of abdominal access to prolapse repair, studies evaluating the vaginal approach with concomitant hysterectomy versus uterus preservation have shown no difference in the, overall low, rates of prolapse recurrence [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For uterus- sparing prolapse repair, apart from AHSP, other abdominal procedures have been described including combined vaginal-abdominal retropubic uterine suspension, pectineal ligament uterine suspension and hysterosacropexy [22,23]. Vaginal procedures have also been described to result in satisfactory outcomes [24][25][26][27][28]. As in the case of abdominal access to prolapse repair, studies evaluating the vaginal approach with concomitant hysterectomy versus uterus preservation have shown no difference in the, overall low, rates of prolapse recurrence [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other serious complications include ureteric kinking (2.9%), pelvic organ injuries like perforation of small bowel, bladder, rectum (0.8%), vaginal adhesions, rectovaginal fistulae (0.5%), and nerve damage or pain (1.8%) (Beer and Kuhn 2005). In one study, where sacrospinous fixation was done for vault prolapse the recurrence rate of vault prolapse was 3.7% but other or new pelvic organ prolapses occurred in the form of cystocoele (5.5%), rectocoele (1.8%), and enterocoele (9.2%) (Ozcan et al 1999). However, an analysis of 2,256 patients showed a vault prolapse recurrence of 3.6% with enterocoele 0.7%, cystocoele 4.6% and rectocoele of 1.5% (Beer and Kuhn 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brummen et al ( 17 ) compared recurrence rates between sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysteropexy and found similar recurrence rates. Recurrence after sacrospinous fixation, which spares the uterus, have also been reported to be low ( 18 , 37 ) . Nicita et al ( 12 ) reported no recurrence in a 31-month follow-up study after vaginal-approach uterus-sparing surgery.…”
Section: Robotic Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%