2023
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.59072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Discharge Needs Following Emergency Care for Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Assault, and Sex Trafficking

Abstract: Introduction For survivors of gender-based violence (GBV) seeking care in hospital emergency departments (ED) the need for medical care and safe discharge is acute. Methods In this study we evaluated safe discharge needs of GBV survivors following hospital-based care at a public hospital in Atlanta, GA, in 2019 and between April 1, 2020–September 30, 2021, using both retrospective chart review and evaluation of a novel clinical observation protocol for safe discharge pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sample ( n = 245) of hospitalized IPV survivors (97% women; mean age 37 years) discharged from a safety-net hospital in Atlanta in 2019 with sporadic CBO services in the hospital, 40% were discharged with no identified safe shelter (defined as discharge to a shelter, a family/friend, or known safe location without a perpetrator present); only 6% were discharged to placement in a shelter ( 25 ). In a related study during the COVID-19 pandemic, after accepting the opportunity to stay in an extended observation unit to optimize the chance for social work intervention, 70.7% of IPV survivors received a safe discharge—including 31% to a shelter—suggesting that increased coordination between hospital- and community-based systems have promise in meeting survivor needs ( 25 ). Despite the critical role of CBOs in supporting IPV survivors, there is limited research examining the perspectives and insights of CBO staff on the challenges and opportunities for improving care coordination with hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a sample ( n = 245) of hospitalized IPV survivors (97% women; mean age 37 years) discharged from a safety-net hospital in Atlanta in 2019 with sporadic CBO services in the hospital, 40% were discharged with no identified safe shelter (defined as discharge to a shelter, a family/friend, or known safe location without a perpetrator present); only 6% were discharged to placement in a shelter ( 25 ). In a related study during the COVID-19 pandemic, after accepting the opportunity to stay in an extended observation unit to optimize the chance for social work intervention, 70.7% of IPV survivors received a safe discharge—including 31% to a shelter—suggesting that increased coordination between hospital- and community-based systems have promise in meeting survivor needs ( 25 ). Despite the critical role of CBOs in supporting IPV survivors, there is limited research examining the perspectives and insights of CBO staff on the challenges and opportunities for improving care coordination with hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%