2023
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2022.3167772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Human-Robot Collaboration via Collision Checking and Explicit Representation of Danger Zones

Abstract: This paper deals with safe human-robot collaboration in the context of speed and separation monitoring paradigm. The core of the approach is to continuously track the separation distance between the robot and the human. The robot speed is then adjusted according to the perceived distance so that it will be able to stop before eventually come into contact with the human. We present an approach that aims at maximizing the productivity of the robot, i.e., its speed, while keeping the prescribed safety requirement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be handled by measuring the height of the robot end-effector or directly by using a skeleton tracker if available. It is also possible to add danger zones as described in [88] and include them in the FL arbitration law. Of course, this approach should not consider the human arm that is directly in contact with the robot (if no co-manipulated object is considered).…”
Section: E Safety Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be handled by measuring the height of the robot end-effector or directly by using a skeleton tracker if available. It is also possible to add danger zones as described in [88] and include them in the FL arbitration law. Of course, this approach should not consider the human arm that is directly in contact with the robot (if no co-manipulated object is considered).…”
Section: E Safety Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has been pursued, for instance, in [13] where robot links are represented as beams and an optimization problem is formulated which provides the velocity scaling factor and the joint velocity commands while guaranteeing a minimum human-robot distance and the fulfillment of physical robot constraints. This work has been recently extended in [14] to include an efficient method to compute danger zones in real-time, i.e., the 3D volumes corresponding to links of the robot where safety constraints are violated. Computing optimal smooth stop trajectories for collision avoidance has been addressed in [15], where the dynamics and torque limits of the robot are taken into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies assume the ergonomic index for tasks assigned to Cobots equal to zero (Stecke & Mokhtarzadeh, 2022;Li et al, 2022;Dalle Mura & Dini, 2022). However, this assumption neglects the fact that Cobots can create a new ergonomic load on workers (Lacevic et al, 2022;Lanzoni et al, 2022;Mura and Dini, 2023). In addition, some tasks can be done in different ways in the presence of cobot in supportive mode, so ergonomic indexes are not equal to zero.…”
Section: Ergonomic Assessment and Impact On Injury Reduction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%