2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe innovation approach: Towards an agile system for dealing with innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the approach should not be seen as a warranty of complete safety, because absolute safety is unreachable (Cobaleda-Siles et al, 2017;Hjorth et al, 2017;van de Poel and Robaey, 2017), and should therefore be considered as a design strategy (van de Poel and Robaey, 2017) since the past showed that each nanomedicine has to be taken as caseby-case (McNeil, 2009). As for the general SbD concept, it has no legal binding and does not replace regulatory requirements (Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the approach should not be seen as a warranty of complete safety, because absolute safety is unreachable (Cobaleda-Siles et al, 2017;Hjorth et al, 2017;van de Poel and Robaey, 2017), and should therefore be considered as a design strategy (van de Poel and Robaey, 2017) since the past showed that each nanomedicine has to be taken as caseby-case (McNeil, 2009). As for the general SbD concept, it has no legal binding and does not replace regulatory requirements (Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its goal is to "reduce uncertainties and risks of human and environmental safety of nanotechnology, starting as early as possible during the innovation process, on the basis of mandatory and voluntary safety and efficacy compliance requirements" (Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2019). The main elements of the general SbD approach are: (1) it uses a stage-gate innovation approach, (2) it is based on three pillars, which are Safe materials and products, Safe production, and Safe use and end-of-life; (3) it includes SbD action for maximizing safety while maintaining functionality, and (4) it is integrated into a Safe Innovation Approach (see extensive description in Kraegeloh et al, 2018;Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2019). Below we show how we changed or adapted these elements of the general SbD approach to nanomedicines (the comparison can be seen in Table 1).…”
Section: Adaptation Of the General Sbd Approach To Nanomedicinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The principle behind SbD includes the safety assessment of nanomedicines as early as possible in their innovation process and throughout their lifecycle by designing out the physicochemical properties with an adverse effect on human health and the environment (Bottero et al, 2017;Soeteman-Hernandez et al, 2019). Several concepts of SbD have arisen from the European projects mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%