Safe Integration for System of Systems: The Safety Cube Theory

Rajabalinejad, Mohammad

doi:10.1109/sysose.2019.8753867

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Safe integration concerns the minimum level of integration accepted by society. In other words, a safely integrated system will be in compliance with both national and international regulations and will offer functions and services that meet safety requirements (Rajabalinejad, 2019a). Relevant regulations and standards often aim to ensure reliable services and accepted levels of safety and quality.…”

Section: Safe Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systems integration theory and fundamentals

Rajabalinejad

Dongen

Ramtahalsing

2020

Safety and Reliability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systems integration is a major challenge across many disciplines, with a large number of technical, project, organisational or environmental problems occurring as a result of improper integration. This article highlights the scope of the challenges facing systems integration and explains why it requires the incorporation of both technical and non-technical domains. Humans, systems and the environment, as well as the interactions among them, significantly contribute to the proper integration of systems. These, however, have been formulated differently across different engineering disciplines. For example, systems engineering considers the human to be part of the system, while railway engineering considers the human to be part of the system environment. This paper explores the fundamentals of integration and lays a theoretical foundation for the integration of systems. It will introduce Safety Cube theory to outline these fundamental aspects of system integration. Example applications are provided at the end of the paper.

show abstract

Section: Safe Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systems integration theory and fundamentals

Rajabalinejad

Dongen

Ramtahalsing

2020

Safety and Reliability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are obvious health risks in the past systems using taste panels and biological components. These have a remote probability of occurrence with a marginal severity, resulting in a medium risk assessment [19]. The proposed system replaces the use of biological components with artificial alternatives.…”

Section: Safety Requirements Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of a tongue equivalent for astringency assessment of plant based proteints

Gamaniel¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consumption of food products containing polyphenols has resulted in a feeling of dryness, roughness and puckering of the oral epithelium which is known as astringency. At high concentrations, astringent food compounds are perceived by consumers as unpleasant and has led food scientist to initiate multiple studies with the aim of reducing the unwanted effects of astringency.This project proposes a tongue equivalent design that closely mimics the properties of oral surfaces which are relevant for assessing changes to oral lubrication resulting from astringency. The nature of interactions occurring at oral interfaces containing astringents point towards a system dependence of astringency and shows the importance of adopting a tribosystems approach.

show abstract

Safe Integration for System of Systems: The Safety Cube Theory

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Systems integration theory and fundamentals

Systems integration theory and fundamentals

Design of a tongue equivalent for astringency assessment of plant based proteints

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About