2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe passage for fish: The case for in-stream turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These innovations aim to mitigate the ecological impacts associated with dam construction and operation. Studies emphasize the development of instream turbines, which exhibit fish-friendly operation over a wide range of riverine velocities and have shown to be environmentally, ecologically, and socially beneficial, especially for off-grid communities [124]. Despite the implementation of fish protection barriers and bypasses, research indicates that a significant proportion of fish (35%-88%) still pass through turbines, highlighting the necessity for well-performing, less selective bypass systems and less harmful turbine technologies [125].…”
Section: Advancements In Hydroelectric Power Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These innovations aim to mitigate the ecological impacts associated with dam construction and operation. Studies emphasize the development of instream turbines, which exhibit fish-friendly operation over a wide range of riverine velocities and have shown to be environmentally, ecologically, and socially beneficial, especially for off-grid communities [124]. Despite the implementation of fish protection barriers and bypasses, research indicates that a significant proportion of fish (35%-88%) still pass through turbines, highlighting the necessity for well-performing, less selective bypass systems and less harmful turbine technologies [125].…”
Section: Advancements In Hydroelectric Power Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…heavily on the flow kinetic energy of the incoming water. A version of this concept, seen in Figure 12h, was recently proposed [125], which resembles a hub-less axial turbine. This concept was found to satisfy pressure drop and strain rate criteria [125], conforming to requirements for safe fish passage [74].…”
Section: Fish-friendly Hydropower Design Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A version of this concept, seen in Figure 12h, was recently proposed [125], which resembles a hub-less axial turbine. This concept was found to satisfy pressure drop and strain rate criteria [125], conforming to requirements for safe fish passage [74]. However, the authors of the work identify that the design is an extremely low head turbine and has a low efficiency (in fact calculated to be much lower than the Betz limit).…”
Section: Fish-friendly Hydropower Design Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For tidal stream energy technologies, the risk of collisions between marine animals (particularly marine mammals, diving sea 2 of 17 birds, fish, and sea turtles) and the moving parts of devices (e.g., turbine blades and rotors, or dynamic technologies like tidal kites or oscillating blades; [15,16]) are generally unknown, but are considered to be the greatest potential risk of turbine operations [12]. As such, collision risk (i.e., the likelihood that animals might be harmed by coming into contact with the moving parts of MRE devices [17]) has been the subject of much research (reviewed in [16]), including modelling exercises (e.g., [18][19][20]), experiments conducted under controlled laboratory conditions (e.g., [21][22][23]), and in situ studies around various operational turbine technologies (e.g., [24][25][26]). Collectively, this body of knowledge provides substantive evidence to suggest that when marine animals can detect operational tidal turbines, they can exhibit avoidance or evasion behaviors [17,27] and take measures to prevent being struck by turbine blades [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%