2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe(r) by design implementation in the nanotechnology industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the older approach, which focused on measures applied retroactively, this approach would ideally be employed in the first steps of development, rather than once the process is started. However, improvements in reducing the risk for humans and the environment can still be achieved even in the later stages [28][29][30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the older approach, which focused on measures applied retroactively, this approach would ideally be employed in the first steps of development, rather than once the process is started. However, improvements in reducing the risk for humans and the environment can still be achieved even in the later stages [28][29][30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in a company that used pure silicon nanoparticles to increase the performance of batteries, the SbD concept implementation helped in lowering the toxicity threat for the workers, as well as lowering the risk of explosion, while achieving higher stability and performance. To do so, the nanoparticles' size was increased from 40 nm to 75 nm to reduce the alveolar deposition and the nanoparticles were coated with amorphous carbon, which led to increased performance and lower risk of explosion [29,31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progression from one stage to the next is regulated by a gate, where the project is evaluated according to a set of adaptable safety criteria, leading to a decision on whether to continue the project or not. Case studies for applying the SbD approach have been performed by the nanotechnology industry ( Sánchez Jiménez et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Shifting From Safe-by-design To Safe- and Sustainable-by-designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common areas to consider in creating a wholistic framework applicable to the rapid pace of nanotechnology development and to the ensuing regulatory requirements include knowledge sharing and transparency in nanotechnology research and development [ 28 • ], stakeholder awareness and participation [ 29 ], acknowledgement of the pacing problem [ 30 ], implementation of sustainability impact assessments [ 31 ], and bioavailability [ 32 ]. Some systems, such as Quality by Design (QbD) [ 19 • ] and the OECD’s Safe(r) Innovation Approach for implementing safety-by-design [ 33 ] in nanotechnology applications have been outlined but have yet to be implemented.…”
Section: Moving Forward: Operationalizing Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%