2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-011-0342-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safeguarding genetic information in Drosophila

Abstract: Eukaryotic cells employ a plethora of conserved proteins and mechanisms to ensure genome integrity. In metazoa, these mechanisms must operate in the context of organism development. This mini-review highlights two emerging features of DNA damage responses in Drosophila: a crosstalk between DNA damage responses and components of the spindle assembly checkpoint, and increasing evidence for the effect of DNA damage on the developmental program at multiple points during the Drosophila life cycle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, it has been used to the study the genetic mechanisms of cancer for nearly 40 years (Gateff and Schneiderman 1974; Gateff 1978), and multiple facets of carcinogenesis have been investigated in that time (reviewed in Rudrapatna et al 2012). Drosophila also has proven to be an invaluable tool to research the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs (Boyd and Setlow 1976; Radcliffe et al 2002; Jaklevic et al 2006; Edwards et al 2011; Gladstone and Su 2011) and the effects of mutations in key DNA repair genes (reviewed in Su 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it has been used to the study the genetic mechanisms of cancer for nearly 40 years (Gateff and Schneiderman 1974; Gateff 1978), and multiple facets of carcinogenesis have been investigated in that time (reviewed in Rudrapatna et al 2012). Drosophila also has proven to be an invaluable tool to research the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs (Boyd and Setlow 1976; Radcliffe et al 2002; Jaklevic et al 2006; Edwards et al 2011; Gladstone and Su 2011) and the effects of mutations in key DNA repair genes (reviewed in Su 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drosophila and vertebrate Chk1 are involved in SAC activation (16,48,49). The S. pombe crb2 mutant arrests in prometaphase in a Chk1-dependent fashion in response to replication stress induced by a topoisomerase I inhibitor (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the DNA damage checkpoint is activated, Chk1 phosphorylates Cdc25 and Wee1, which maintain Cdc2 in an inactive state, resulting in cell cycle arrest at the G 2 /M transition (7)(8)(9)(10). A link between DNA damage and the SAC in many organisms, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila, and humans (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), has been suggested. However, the molecular details of this link are not well understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camptothecin is a competitive inhibitor of this enzyme. Camptothecin, the crystalized ligand of cyp2d6 and its derivatives stabilize the normally transient covalent link between DNA and Top1, thereby interfering with the relaxation of supercoiling that occurs during events requiring DNA unwinding, such as replication or transcription [27,28,29]. Previous finding proposes that the accumulation of regressed forks or supercoiled DNA is responsible for the toxic effects of camptothecin [30].…”
Section: Tramadol Detoxification Potential Of Cyp2d6mentioning
confidence: 99%