2019
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30217-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and activity of ibrutinib in combination with nivolumab in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1/2a study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
119
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data evaluating somatic mutations associated with response are hypothesis generating, precluding definitive conclusion and requiring further confirmation. While the association of PD‐L1 expression with response could not be determined in this study, recent work has demonstrated an association between expression of PD‐L1 and CR in DLBCL patients treated with combination ibrutinib and nivolumab, an antibody to the PD‐1 receptor . The difference in results of the two studies could be attributed to potential differences in the mechanism of action of durvalumab and nivolumab (ie, PD‐L1 rather than PD‐1 blockade), differences in methodologies for PD‐L1 detection and definitions of elevated PD‐L1 expression, or other differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These data evaluating somatic mutations associated with response are hypothesis generating, precluding definitive conclusion and requiring further confirmation. While the association of PD‐L1 expression with response could not be determined in this study, recent work has demonstrated an association between expression of PD‐L1 and CR in DLBCL patients treated with combination ibrutinib and nivolumab, an antibody to the PD‐1 receptor . The difference in results of the two studies could be attributed to potential differences in the mechanism of action of durvalumab and nivolumab (ie, PD‐L1 rather than PD‐1 blockade), differences in methodologies for PD‐L1 detection and definitions of elevated PD‐L1 expression, or other differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Despite pre-clinical evidence supporting the combination of ibrutinib and checkpoint blockade, a phase 1/2a trial of nivolumab with ibrutinib demonstrated an ORR of 61% in patients with R/R CLL, similar to the ORR previously reported with single-agent ibrutinib [87]. In contrast, the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in Richter transformation appears to be more promising.…”
Section: Combining Btk Inhibitors With Checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Preliminary data from ongoing clinical trials suggest that anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) have promising activity in patients with Richter's transformation. [36][37][38] In a phase I/ II study that included 20 patients with Richter's transformation, nivolumab + ibrutinib resulted in an ORR of 60% (CR, 5% and PR, 55%) 37 ; median PFS was 4 months. Diarrhea (31%), pyrexia (23%), and fatigue (23%) were the most common treatment-related grade 1/2 adverse events.…”
Section: Nccn Guidelines ® Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%