“…Subgroup analysis showed that the BP‐SES significantly favored lesions ≤20 mm versus >20 mm in TLF (5.7% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.01), primarily driven by higher periprocedural TV‐MI, which was related to the PCI process and jeopardized side branch after PCI. Although much shorter than other long‐stent studies, such as the LONG‐DES‐V trial, the 12‐month TLFs of the DP‐BES and DP‐EES were 16.3% and 16.5%, respectively , and our finding was consistent with that of the TARGET study, with another BP‐SES (Firehawk, Microport Medical, Shanghai, China) demonstrated that longer lesion was an independent predictor for 2‐year TLF (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.32–4.53) . One possible explanation is that BP might be less physically robust than DP when pushing DES, particularly in longer lesions.…”