2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00019-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
347
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
347
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, the results from the Phase II clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of antibodies directed against CGRP or the CGRP receptor are promising [16,17,[38][39][40]. This is potentially good news for patients with migraine or (possibly) cluster headache because specifically designed, effective, and well-tolerated prophylactic agents against these diseases are currently not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus far, the results from the Phase II clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of antibodies directed against CGRP or the CGRP receptor are promising [16,17,[38][39][40]. This is potentially good news for patients with migraine or (possibly) cluster headache because specifically designed, effective, and well-tolerated prophylactic agents against these diseases are currently not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies were performed in normal, anesthetized animals without pre-existing or induced ischemia. In patients with migraine, no cardiovascular adverse events were observed in five, relatively small and short-lasting, Phase II clinical trials with four different antibodies directed against CGRP or its receptor [16,17,[38][39][40]. The issue of cardiovascular safety was specifically addressed in two small studies, one in 31 healthy women [41] and another in 56 cynomolgus monkeys [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that CGRP does not directly activate trigeminal dural afferents but potentiates the release of nociceptive agents into the perivascular space [31; 46]. Clinical investigations have now demonstrated that small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (e.g., AMG334 [68]) are also efficacious against migraine [38; 55]; however, development of this therapeutic class remains uncertain due to safety issues. The precise site of action of small molecule CGRP antagonists remains to be confirmed but studies using PET imaging in humans showed poor penetration of telcagepant to the brain at therapeutically effective doses [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBR101/TEV-48125 (Labys Biologics, Pfizer, USATeva Pharmaceuticals, USA) has been proven to be efficient in migraine prevention [76] and an ongoing phase III clinical trial will be completed by October 2017 [74]. AMG 334 (Amgen, USA-Novartis) is the only mAb that targets the CGRP receptors [77]. A phase III trial was started in 2015 and will end in March 2017 [74].…”
Section: Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide (Cgrp)mentioning
confidence: 99%