Safety and efficacy of an intra-oral electrostimulator for the relief of dry mouth in patients with chronic graft versus host disease: Case Series

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) often suffer from dry mouth and oral mucosal lesions. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety of an intra-oral electrostimulator (GenNarino) in symptomatic cGVHD patients. The secondary objective was to study the impact on the salivary gland involvement of cGVHD patients. Study Design: This paper presents a case series. The study included patients treated for 4 weeks, randomly assigned to the active device and then crossed-over to a sham-device or vice versa. The patients and clinicians were blind to the treatment delivered. Data regarding oral mucosal and salivary gland involvement were collected. Results: Six patients were included in this series. Most of the intraoral areas with manifestations of cGVHD were not in contact with the GenNarino device. Two patients developed mild mucosal lesions in areas in contact with the GenNarino during the study. However, only one of them had a change in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) score for oral cGVHD. The unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rate increased in 4 out of the 5 patients included in this analysis. Symptoms of dry mouth and general oral comfort improved. Conclusion: This study suggests that GenNarino is safe in cGVHD patients with respect to oral tissues. Furthermore the use of GenNarino resulted in subjective and objective improvements in dry mouth symptoms. A large scale study is needed to confirm the impact and safety of GenNarino on systemic cGVHD. Key words:Dry mouth, graft versus host disease, electrostimulation, oral mucosa, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Tratamento das manifestações orais da doença enxerto contra o hospedeiro crônica: revisão sistêmica da literatura

“…13 Segundo a conferência do NIH, é o sialogogo de escolha, junto com a pilocarpina. O uso de eletroestimulador 21 não está descrito nas revisões de literatura, tão pouco nos consensos, apesar de uma série de casos alcançarem resultados significativos. Houve poucos efeitos colaterais, sua ocorrência se deu por meio do manuseio incorreto, pelo contato direto do aparelho com a mucosa.…”

Recent advances of pacemakers in treatment of xerostomia: A systematic review

“…[10] A study was performed by Zadik et al . [20] on six patients with graft versus host disease and it was concluded that the device usage is purely safe.…”

Perspectives on oral chronic graft-versus-host disease from immunobiology to morbid diagnoses

“…Sialagogue therapy, commonly Pilocarpine, remains an option but patients need close observation for development of any potential pulmonary side-effects ( 35 , 176 ). One study tested a soft mouth guard with electrostimulation providing apparent relief of symptoms; however, large-scale studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy ( 177 ). In the case of mucoceles, the effect of topical corticosteroids is non-significant, surgical removal or corticosteroid injection might improve clinical status, but this is seldom needed due to spontaneous recovery ( 35 , 173 , 178 ).…”