The aim of this study is to compare the effects of candesartan and olmesartan on insulin sensitivity-related parameters, before and after antihypertensive therapy. After a 4-week washout placebo period, 194 hypertensive (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) X80 mm Hg and systolic blood pressure (SBP) X130 mm Hg) patients with well-controlled type II diabetes were randomized to receive either 8 mg of candesartan once a day (o.d.) or 10 mg olmesartan o.d. and titrated after 1 month to 16 mg candesartan o.d. or 20 mg olmesartan o.d., respectively; the treatment period had a 1-year duration. We evaluated body weight, body mass index, SBP, DBP, glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, M value, adiponectin (ADN), resistin (r), retinol-binding protein 4, visfatin, vaspin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) at their baseline values and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. We observed no variation in body weight or glycemic profile for either treatment. SBP and DBP were significantly reduced by both treatments (from 144 ± 8/88 ± 6 to 126 ± 5/77 ± 4 mm Hg by candesartan (Po0.001) and from 145 ± 9/89 ± 7 to 128 ± 7/79 ± 5 mm Hg by olmesartan (Po0.001)) without any difference between them. Retinol binding protein-4, r, and the vaspin value decreased in the candesartan group but not in olmesartan group. The M value, visfatin and ADN increased with candesartan, whereas no significant variations were observed with olmesartan. Both treatments resulted in a similar reduction in Hs-CRP. Although both therapies resulted in similar reductions in blood pressure, candesartan therapy was more effective than olmesartan therapy in improving insulin sensitivity. Keywords: adipokines; candesartan; olmesartan; type II diabetes mellitus
INTRODUCTIONThe renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system (RAAS) is involved in a large number of physiopathological processes leading to hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. Apparently, the principal mediator of such processes is angiotensin II (AII). 1 Evidence from animal models and cultured skeletal muscle cell line studies indicates that AII can induce insulin resistance, mediated by the impairment of insulin receptor substrate-1-dependent insulin signaling that is reversed by the administration of angiotensin receptor antagonism. 2 In addition, recent literature shows that AII is also strongly involved in adipose tissue metabolism. In fact, both angiotensin type 1 and 2 receptors have been localized to adipocytes, and differences in the regional expression of RAAS components in visceral vs. subcutaneous adipose tissue have been used to explain the link between abdominal obesity and cardiovascular disease. 3 Moreover, AII reduces the adipogenic response of adipocyte progenitor cells; the extent of this reduction correlates directly with the body mass index (BMI) of