2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Abstract: Convalescent plasma (CP) from patients recovered from COVID-19 is one of the most studied anti-viral therapies against SARS-COV-2 infection. The aim of this study is to summarize the evidence from the available systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of CP in COVID-19 through an overview of the published systematic reviews (SRs). A systematic literature search was conducted up to August 2021 in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Medrxiv databases to identify systematic reviews focusing on CP us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, evidence is growing (including our work) that the quantity of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies is correlated with the severity of disease, highest in the most severe cases ( 32 ), implying that a small additional infusion cannot provide significant benefit. However, there are trials reporting beneficial outcomes of CCP usage for COVID-19 treatment ( 17 , 33 , 34 ), particularly those attributed to the high-titre CCP usage early in the course of the illness ( 13 , 15 , 16 , 23 ). Currently collected data on the CCP treatment of COVID-19 in patients with innate or acquired immunosuppression have been promising and warrant further investigation ( 14 , 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, evidence is growing (including our work) that the quantity of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies is correlated with the severity of disease, highest in the most severe cases ( 32 ), implying that a small additional infusion cannot provide significant benefit. However, there are trials reporting beneficial outcomes of CCP usage for COVID-19 treatment ( 17 , 33 , 34 ), particularly those attributed to the high-titre CCP usage early in the course of the illness ( 13 , 15 , 16 , 23 ). Currently collected data on the CCP treatment of COVID-19 in patients with innate or acquired immunosuppression have been promising and warrant further investigation ( 14 , 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CCP have produced mixed results, probably due to the wide heterogeneity in their study designs and patient populations enrolled [ 7 ]. Furthermore, these trials were heterogeneous with respect to the characteristics of the CCP used (e.g., in terms of antibody content and stratification of recipients according to their serological status or disease severity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another metanalysis of 18 peer-review clinical trials, 3 preprints, and 26 observational studies actually found that CCP use was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality in severe or critical COVID-19 patients (86). A recent umbrella review of 29 metanalyses and systematic reviews found evidences for improvement in the CCP arms for some outcomes (overall mortality, viral clearance at day 3,) but not for others (clinical improvement, length of hospital stay (87).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%