2018
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s161871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of pulmonary metastatic giant cell tumor of bone

Abstract: BackgroundGiant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is an intermittent and locally aggressive tumor with increasing pulmonary metastatic potential. In this study, we evaluated the interim clinical outcome of denosumab in patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed seven patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT who received denosumab treatment after local tumor surgery during January 2014 and July 2016. Denosumab treatment for all patients lasted for at least 12 months. Serial che… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of their patients with metastatic disease progression was found during an average of 28.6 months follow-up period. Three patients showed partial response and four patients got stable disease after denosumab treatment [8]. An open-label, phase II study divided GCTB patients into 3 cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of their patients with metastatic disease progression was found during an average of 28.6 months follow-up period. Three patients showed partial response and four patients got stable disease after denosumab treatment [8]. An open-label, phase II study divided GCTB patients into 3 cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical review of these published studies identified 60 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis ( Table 1 ). 11 , 12 , 44 , 60 - 116 The www.clinicaltrials.gov website showed 7 ongoing studies of denosumab in the treatment of GCTB. The majority of the studies examined for this meta-analysis were case reports, case series studies, and nonrandomized, uncontrolled, open-label phase II studies ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 77 (2018) Scoccia nti et al 78 (2018) Yang et al 79 (2018) Luo et al 80 (2018) Chen et al 81 (2018) Rutkow ski et al 82 (2018) Errani et al 83 (2018) Ji et al 86 (2017) Deveci et al 93 increase the risk of new malignant diseases (eg, osteosarcoma) because of immunosuppression. 91,118 The most common location of GCTB on participants from all study types in this evaluation was the lower limbs, followed by the upper limbs and sacrum, which is in agreement with the data of another study.…”
Section: Agarwalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is very consistent to work reported by others. 25 The pH in the tumor microenvironment is weakly acidic, ie, 6.8, while in endosomes and lysosomes is much more acidic, ie, 5.5. 26 Therefore, it is logical to assume that the released DOX in tumors is more than in normal tissues at a physiological pH of 7.4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%