2014
DOI: 10.4161/hv.28077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of DNA vaccines

Abstract: While DNA vaccination using plasmid vectors is highly attractive, there is a need for further vector optimization regarding safety, stability, and efficiency. In this commentary, we review the minicircle vector (MC), which is an entity devoid of plasmid bacterial sequences, as an alternative to the traditional plasmid construct. The commentary highlights the recent discovery by Stenler et al. (2014) that the small size of an MC enables improved resistance to the shearing forces associated with e.g. pneumatic d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the removal of all bacterial sequences from the plasmid vector, including any antibiotic resistance genes, makes mcDNA a safer alternative than plasmids. The administration of mcDNA also provided prolonged transgene expression in vivo (24), enhanced serum stability (25) and increased resistance to shearing forces (26). Since its discovery, mcDNA has been used mainly in the field of gene therapy for human use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the removal of all bacterial sequences from the plasmid vector, including any antibiotic resistance genes, makes mcDNA a safer alternative than plasmids. The administration of mcDNA also provided prolonged transgene expression in vivo (24), enhanced serum stability (25) and increased resistance to shearing forces (26). Since its discovery, mcDNA has been used mainly in the field of gene therapy for human use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its discovery, mcDNA has been used mainly in the field of gene therapy for human use. Most recently, the application of mcDNA as a vaccine delivery tool began in 2013 (27), and it appeared to induce a significantly stronger immune response than the parental plasmids (25,28), especially in terms of the CD8 ϩ T cell-mediated cellular immune response (27). However, the application of mcDNA in vaccine studies has mainly focused on human diseases, such as cancer (29)(30)(31) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) (32) and HIV (33) infections, probably due to the complicated purification process, low production rate, and high preparation cost of mcDNA, which dramatically restrict the application of this system in practical veterinary applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alveolar infiltrates were not observed in the lungs of mice treated with Dg-cSCK:pDNA nanocomplexes. While Dg-cSCK has the capacity for successful in vivo gene delivery, it is also possible that Dg-cSCK carriage of new generation minicircle DNA plasmids lacking prokaryotic sequences or plasmids with eukaryotic promoters would enhance both levels and maintenance of gene expression[59, 60]. Due to its relative biocompatibility, gene transfer potential, and degradability, therapeutic plasmids such as those for modulating infection, inflammation or fibrosis could be delivered in an identical manner as pLuc in this study to provide therapy for acute (e.g., respiratory virus infection) and chronic (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis) lung diseases with minimal adverse effects from the nanocarrier[10, 11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although integration and possible insertional mutagenesis also are safety concerns with many gene vectors, particularly viruses, even with very effective delivery methods (e.g., electroporation), the in vivo integration rates of nonviral vectors (plasmids and MCs) are approximately three orders of magnitude below the rate of spontaneous gene-inactivating mutations (35)(36)(37)(38)(39). MCs also are more resistant than plasmids to shearing stress and linearization (40,41), an important characteristic that has been correlated with integration rates (42). Therefore, although extensive safety testing must be done before eventual clinical translation, our tumoractivatable MC system should be considered relatively safe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%