2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Cancer Post Solid Organ Transplantation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This literature analysis and others 7,8,42,[51][52][53][54][55] provide an overview of the benefit and risk associated with ICI use in cancer management in transplantation. ICI are a useful tool in cancer management than can rarely be left aside in the setting of solid organ transplantation despite the risk of rejection.…”
Section: Multidisciplinary Decision Making Before Starting Ici In Sotrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This literature analysis and others 7,8,42,[51][52][53][54][55] provide an overview of the benefit and risk associated with ICI use in cancer management in transplantation. ICI are a useful tool in cancer management than can rarely be left aside in the setting of solid organ transplantation despite the risk of rejection.…”
Section: Multidisciplinary Decision Making Before Starting Ici In Sotrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in clinical practice, oncologists had to deal with cases of SOTR with chemotherapy-refractory cancer for whom ICI appeared as the only therapeutic option. Publications of individual cases and small series since 2015 and subsequent meta-analyses 7,8,42,[51][52][53][54][55] provided a preliminary overview of the risk and efficacy of ICI management in SOTR. For example, in several studies, it is now clear that SOTR treated with anti-PD-1 are at higher risk of transplant rejection than patients treated with anti-CTLA-4, 7,51,56 although nonsignificantly in some recent meta-analyses.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunosuppression may predispose to cancer by inhibiting immune surveillance, suppressing DNA repair, and predisposing to oncogenic viral infections (48)(49)(50). Although transplant recipients have been excluded from all clinical trials of ICPIs to date, based on the concern of triggering rejection upon blockade of immune inhibitory signals, case reports and small case series of transplanted recipients receiving ICPIs have begun to emerge with conflicting results (51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62). We reviewed all published case reports and case series and found that the rejection rate with ipilimumab monotherapy was 33% compared to 52% in patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Figure 3) (63).…”
Section: What Are Special Considerations In Transplant Patients?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figura 2. Mecanismo de acción de los inhibidores del punto de control (21,22,30). Mecanismo de acción de los inhibidores de punto de control.…”
Section: Inhibidores Del Punto De Controlunclassified