2010
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1002028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor, in Myelofibrosis

Abstract: Background Myelofibrosis is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with cytopenias, splenomegaly, poor quality of life, and shortened survival. About half of patients with myelofibrosis carry a gain-of-function mutation in the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) that contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease. INCB018424 is a potent and selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor. Methods We conducted a phase 1–2 trial of INCB018424 in patients with JAK2 V617F–po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

39
1,068
1
25

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,071 publications
(1,138 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
39
1,068
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of these patients either belong to higher-risk disease categories, which mandate instead consideration for ASCT, or are the same ones who have anemia or thrombocytopenia, which happen to constitute the main adverse effects of such drugs. 24,25 One interesting aspect of the current study was the significantly higher prevalence of adverse risk factors in patients seen within 1 year of diagnosis compared with those seen at the time of initial diag- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, most of these patients either belong to higher-risk disease categories, which mandate instead consideration for ASCT, or are the same ones who have anemia or thrombocytopenia, which happen to constitute the main adverse effects of such drugs. 24,25 One interesting aspect of the current study was the significantly higher prevalence of adverse risk factors in patients seen within 1 year of diagnosis compared with those seen at the time of initial diag- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…37,38 The particular information also points out the limitations of drugs that display anemia as an adverse effect, which is a recurrent issue with certain JAK inhibitors. 24,25 The study also suggests that about a third of patients present with marked splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms and might, therefore, benefit from JAK inhibitor therapy. However, most of these patients either belong to higher-risk disease categories, which mandate instead consideration for ASCT, or are the same ones who have anemia or thrombocytopenia, which happen to constitute the main adverse effects of such drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ruxolitinib is the first FDA-and EMA approved JAK2-/JAK1-inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis. In the COMFORT-studies, the response rates for AP were up to 92% [21,22]. This implies that the JAK2/JAK1 pathway is involved in the generation of AP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of novel JAK2 inhibitors seems promising, 63,64 so that I encourage PMF and PV/ET patients with symptomatic refractory splenomegaly and severe constitutional symptoms to participate in clinical trials. However, I underscore that there is no evidence that these novel drugs can eradicate or modify the natural history of disease.…”
Section: My Advice To Young Patients In Relation To Clinical Trials Wmentioning
confidence: 99%