2014
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of intensive intraoperative glycaemic control in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a randomised trial

Abstract: Intraoperative intensive glycaemic treatment significantly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia, but its effect on post-operative infection by clinical assessment could not be determined. Anaesthetic duration, pre-operative and post-operative IL-6 levels can independently predict post-operative infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the beneficial effects of tight glycemic control during cardiac surgery in patients remain questioned and controversial as conflicting reports have emerged. In contrast to aforementioned studies, other researches demonstrated that intensive blood glucose control has no effect on reducing mortality in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes [ 21 ] and significantly increased the risk of intraoperative hypoglycaemia without clear postoperative benefit in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary [ 22 ]. So far, to our knowledge, there is no direct evidence to explore the effects and mechanism of tight glycemic control during myocardial IRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the beneficial effects of tight glycemic control during cardiac surgery in patients remain questioned and controversial as conflicting reports have emerged. In contrast to aforementioned studies, other researches demonstrated that intensive blood glucose control has no effect on reducing mortality in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes [ 21 ] and significantly increased the risk of intraoperative hypoglycaemia without clear postoperative benefit in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary [ 22 ]. So far, to our knowledge, there is no direct evidence to explore the effects and mechanism of tight glycemic control during myocardial IRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para un total de 3948 pacientes, los participantes incluidos en los estudios identificados fueron pacientes llevados a cirugía cardiaca, cirugía mayor no cardiaca, gastrectomía, injerto o derivación cardiopulmonar, cirugía que requirió uso de oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea, reparación o reemplazo valvular, cirugía electiva de arteria coronaria multivaso o cirugía de tumores malignos. En el análisis agrupado, se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa, a favor del control de glicemia perioperatoria, para reducir el riesgo de infección posoperatoria (RR 0.62; IC 95% 0.50 a 0.77; certeza de la evidencia alta) [202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215][216][217][218] .…”
Section: Resumen De La Evidenciaunclassified
“…También se observó un mayor riesgo, estadísticamente significativo, de eventos hipoglicémicos con el control de glicemia (22 estudios; 5665 pacientes; RR 0.04; IC 95% 0.03 a 0.06; certeza de la evidencia alta) 202,204,205,[207][208][209][210][211][215][216][217][218][219][220][221][222][223][224][226][227][228] . No se identificaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas con el control de glicemia perioperatoria frente a la atención estándar, esta última definida como una estrategia liberal o sin control de glicemia, para los desenlaces de: déficit neurológico (5 ECAs; 1726; Diferencia de riesgo -0.01; IC 95% -0.02 a -0.00; certeza de la evidencia alta) (204,206,207,220,228), y evento cerebrovascular (5 ECAs; 1521 pacientes; Diferencia de riesgo 0.02; IC 95% 0 a 0.03; certeza de la evidencia baja) 209,210,216,217,228 .…”
Section: Resumen De La Evidenciaunclassified
“…© 2020 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC Barcellos 2007;Ellenberger 2018;Foroughi 2012;Howell 2011;Koskenkari 2005;Koskenkari 2006;Lazar 2004;Licker 2019;Ranasinghe 2006;Roh 2015;Rujirojindakul 2014;Seied-Hosseini 2010;Smith 2002;Straus 2013;Tsang 2007;Visser 2005]. Figure 1 shows the details of the study selection process in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).…”
Section: E65mentioning
confidence: 99%