Safety and Efficacy of Intentional Celiac Artery Coverage in Endovascular Management of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an attractive alternative option in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) diseases, reporting lower morbidity and mortality rates compared with open or hybrid repair. A challenging situation arises when the aneurysm involves the celiac artery (CA), precluding a safe distal landing zone. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CA coverage in the treatment of complex TAAA diseases during endovascular management. Materials and Methods: A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The electronic bibliographic sources searched were MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Primary outcomes of interest were perioperative and 30-day mortality. Any type of endoleak, mesenteric ischemia, perioperative spinal cord ischemia, and reintervention rates were secondary end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Summary statistics of event risks were expressed as proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Ten observational cohort studies published between 2009 and 2020, reporting a total of 175 patients, were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Indications for TEVAR were primary TAAAs in 82% of patients, aortic dissection in 14% of patients, type Ib endoleak after previous endograft deployment in 3% of patients, and penetrating aortic ulcer in 1 patient. Reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI, 4%–20%) and spinal cord ischemia was 7% (95% CI, 4%–-12%). Type II endoleak was the predominant type of endoleak in 10% of patients (95% CI, 4%–22%), followed by type I endoleak in 5% of patients (95% CI, 2%–12%) and type III endoleak in 1% (95% CI, 0%–16%) of patients. Mesenteric ischemia occurred in 6% of patients (95% CI, 3%–10%). Thirty-day mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%–13%) and the pooled estimate for overall mortality was 21% (95% CI, 14%–31%). Conclusions: Celiac artery coverage during TEVAR is a challenging but feasible option for the treatment of TAAA diseases, providing acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Demonstration of adequate visceral collateral pathways before definitive CA coverage is the sine quo non for the success of the technique.

Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair

“…Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been limited to specific approaches (open or endovascular; endovascular or medical management) [ 12 – 14 ], pathology (complicated or uncomplicated) [ 15 ], or assessment of intentional celiac artery coverage [ 16 , 17 ]. There has been no inclusive contemporary analysis of the effect of CSFD on SCI after endovascular repair of TBAD.…”