2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Computer-Navigated Versus Non-Navigated Shoulder Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Referral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
20
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, the surgical time is increased around 6 up to 31 minutes. 1,5,10,12 In another study, the navigated surgery was 2.2 minutes faster, but not statistically significant (p ¼ 0.07). 15 Barrett et al described 2 cases (5.5%) of coracoid process fracture due to the fixation of the sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the literature, the surgical time is increased around 6 up to 31 minutes. 1,5,10,12 In another study, the navigated surgery was 2.2 minutes faster, but not statistically significant (p ¼ 0.07). 15 Barrett et al described 2 cases (5.5%) of coracoid process fracture due to the fixation of the sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the initial results are promising. 4,5 In one of the first experiments with the aid of intraoperative computation, Bicknel et al, 9 in 2007, used a computer-assisted surgical technique for the treatment of four-part fractures using hemiarthroplasty. They showed a statistically significant difference when using the computer-assisted method in determining the offset of the humeral head.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intra-operative CT-based navigation accuracy in orthopedic surgery has been proven in several studies, [19][20][21][22] but very few studies exist about navigation in shoulder arthroplasty, and those are mostly in experimental setups using cadaveric specimens. 21,24,25 The aim of this study was to determine whether intraoperative CT-based navigation could improve the glenoid baseplate position and fixation by increasing the length of screw, decreasing the number of screws needed to obtain primary fixation, and eventually increasing the use of augmented baseplate in patients undergoing RSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various systems have been developed to assist in glenoid component implantation including the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Numerous papers have reported a superiority in the accuracy of CAS; however, CAS is hampered by a significant increase in operation time and a lack of reliability [ 5 , 6 ]. Using custom-made patient-specific guides prepared from preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography has grown in popularity due to their capacity to reduce surgical time and their reported great accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%