2012
DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000700004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of large balloon sphincteroplasty in a third care hospital

Abstract: Background and aims: large balloon sphincteroplasty (LBS) associated with sphincterotomy (ES) has gained acceptance as a useful tool in extracting difficult bile duct stones. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LBS with balloons ≥ 10 mm in clinical practice setting.Patients and methods: unicentre prospective study in a tertiary care hospital. All patients who underwent LBS associated with ES between July 2007 and March 2011 were included prospectively in a database recording clinical aspects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increasingly widespread availability of advanced ERCP techniques, such as balloon sphincteroplasty and endoscopic choledochoscopy (e.g. Spyglass), even very large stones can be cleared endoscopically . This may make clearance of the bile duct at the time of surgery less imperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasingly widespread availability of advanced ERCP techniques, such as balloon sphincteroplasty and endoscopic choledochoscopy (e.g. Spyglass), even very large stones can be cleared endoscopically . This may make clearance of the bile duct at the time of surgery less imperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martín-Arranz maintains insufflation during one minute [9], while other authors limit this time to between 15 -30 seconds [13,17]. Most studies, including our own, use balloon diameters of between 10 and 20 mm [6,9,11,13,[17][18][19][20], and in abidance with our own practice, it is generally advised not to exceed the diameter of the biliary tract [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical lithotripsy devices are not always easy to handle, and tend to significantly prolong the procedure. In addition, they are less effective in application to large or impacted stones, and have a relatively high complication rate [5,9,10]. More sophisti-cated intraductal lithotripsy techniques such as electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy, etc., for the fragmentation of large stones, are expensive and available in very few centers [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations