2019
DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Lofexidine for Medically Managed Opioid Withdrawal: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The label analyses were less conservative and used a "missing at random" approach with no imputation of missing data. Nonetheless, SOWS-G efficacy results presented in the label analyses, using a "missing at random" approach, were very similar to the per-protocol "missing not at random" analyses previously reported 9,10 . This confirmation of SOWS-G results across two different statistical analyses corroborates the efficacy of lofexidine for treatment of OWS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The label analyses were less conservative and used a "missing at random" approach with no imputation of missing data. Nonetheless, SOWS-G efficacy results presented in the label analyses, using a "missing at random" approach, were very similar to the per-protocol "missing not at random" analyses previously reported 9,10 . This confirmation of SOWS-G results across two different statistical analyses corroborates the efficacy of lofexidine for treatment of OWS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Pivotal study data analyses presented in the lofexidine prescribing information (label; LUCEMYRA, US WorldMeds LLC) differ from the previously published study reports 9,10 . Specifically, the main efficacy endpoint (Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale of Gossop [SOWS-G] 2 score change) and subject retention rates were analyzed and presented to standardize analyses across the two studies and improve ease of data interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The efficacy of lofexidine for the mitigation of OWS was established in 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trials of 866 inpatient adults using short‐acting opioids (eg heroin, hydrocodone, oxycodone) who met DSM‐IV criteria for opioid dependence and were undergoing abrupt opioid discontinuation (Study 1: NCT01863186 and Study 2: NCT00235729) . Patients were randomized to receive either lofexidine or placebo, and study endpoints were treatment benefit (evaluated using mean total Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale of Gossop [SOWS‐Gossop]) scores at baseline and each study day, as well as the proportion of patients who completed the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOWS‐Gossop is a patient‐reported outcome instrument that evaluates a number of OWS. Patients were asked to rate the severity of each symptom severity using four response options (‘none’, ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ and ‘severe’); the total potential score ranged from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater withdrawal symptom severity . In both studies, patients in the lofexidine groups reported significantly lower mean SOWS‐Gossop total scores over the study periods compared with placebo.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Approval was obtained on the basis of results of 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials comparing lofexidine with placebo in patients undergoing inpatient opioid withdrawal. 16,17 Both studies demonstrated a benefit with lofexidine in decreasing opioid withdrawal symptoms and improving treatment retention rates when compared with placebo. 16,17 Upon FDA approval of lofexidine in the United States, the FDA required 15 postmarketing studies to assess the safety of lofexidine continually.…”
Section: Lofexidine Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%