2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for prevention of thromboembolism in adults with systemic right ventricle: Results from the NOTE international registry

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advent of DOAC therapy has seen it become the OAC agent of choice for most anticoagulation indications which has raised questions regarding its applicability in the treatment of sRV thrombus in the setting of the limited data. The international NOTE registry evaluated 530 adults with congenital heart disease treated with OAC for various indications and concluded non-inferior efficacy and safety of DOAC use compared to VKA; subgroup analysis of 76 patients with sRV found high efficacy and safety rates[ 33 , 34 ]. Another similar study of 215 patients with different congenital heart diseases quoted high efficacy rates but non-negligible bleeding risks[ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of DOAC therapy has seen it become the OAC agent of choice for most anticoagulation indications which has raised questions regarding its applicability in the treatment of sRV thrombus in the setting of the limited data. The international NOTE registry evaluated 530 adults with congenital heart disease treated with OAC for various indications and concluded non-inferior efficacy and safety of DOAC use compared to VKA; subgroup analysis of 76 patients with sRV found high efficacy and safety rates[ 33 , 34 ]. Another similar study of 215 patients with different congenital heart diseases quoted high efficacy rates but non-negligible bleeding risks[ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%