OBJECTIVE -To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on insulin glargine versus rosiglitazone in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual oral therapy with sulfonylurea plus metformin. randomized, parallel trial, 217 patients (HbA 1c [A1C] 7.5-11%, BMI Ͼ25 kg/m 2 ) on Ն50% of maximal-dose sulfonylurea and metformin received add-on insulin glargine 10 units/day or rosiglitazone 4 mg/day. Insulin glargine was forced-titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) Յ5.5-6.7 mmol/l (Յ100 -120 mg/dl), and rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day any time after 6 weeks if FPG was Ͼ5.5 mmol/l. RESULTS -A1C improvements from baseline were similar in both groups (Ϫ1.7 vs. Ϫ1.5% for insulin glargine vs. rosiglitazone, respectively); however, when baseline A1C was Ͼ9.5%, the reduction of A1C with insulin glargine was greater than with rosiglitazone (P Ͻ 0.05). Insulin glargine yielded better FPG values than rosiglitazone (Ϫ3.6 Ϯ 0.23 vs. Ϫ2.6 Ϯ 0.22 mmol/l; P ϭ 0.001). Insulin glargine final dose per day was 38 Ϯ 26 IU vs. 7.1 Ϯ 2 mg for rosiglitazone. Confirmed hypoglycemic events at plasma glucose Ͻ3.9 mmol/l (Ͻ70 mg/dl) were slightly greater for the insulin glargine group (n ϭ 57) than for the rosiglitazone group (n ϭ 47) (P ϭ 0.0528). The calculated average rate per patient-year of a confirmed hypoglycemic event (Ͻ70 mg/dl), after adjusting for BMI, was 7.7 (95% CI 5.4 -10.8) and 3.4 (2.3-5.0) for the insulin glargine and rosiglitazone groups, respectively (P ϭ 0.0073). More patients in the insulin glargine group had confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia of Ͻ3.9 mmol/l (P ϭ 0.02) and Ͻ2.8 mmol/l (P Ͻ 0.05) than in the rosiglitazone group. Effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels from baseline to end point with insulin glargine (Ϫ4.4, Ϫ1.4, and Ϫ19.0%, respectively) contrasted with those of rosiglitazone (ϩ10.1, ϩ13.1, and ϩ4.6%, respectively; P Ͻ 0.002). HDL cholesterol was unchanged with insulin glargine but increased with rosiglitazone by 4.4% (P Ͻ 0.05). Insulin glargine had less weight gain than rosiglitazone (1.6 Ϯ 0.4 vs. 3.0 Ϯ 0.4 kg; P ϭ 0.02), fewer adverse events (7 vs. 29%; P ϭ 0.0001), and no peripheral edema (0 vs. 12.5%). Insulin glargine saved $235/patient over 24 weeks compared with rosiglitazone.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -In thisCONCLUSIONS -Low-dose insulin glargine combined with a sulfonylurea and metformin resulted in similar A1C improvements except for greater reductions in A1C when baseline was Ն9.5% compared with add-on maximum-dose rosiglitazone. Further, insulin glargine was associated with more hypoglycemia but less weight gain, no edema, and salutary lipid changes at a lower cost of therapy.
Diabetes Care 29:554 -559, 2006O ver 60% of Americans with type 2 diabetes have HbA 1c (A1C) levels Ͼ7% following stepwise treatments that fail to address the dual defects of insulin secretion and action responsible for the relentless disease course (1-3). Despite evidence that single-agent therapy for type 2 diabetes seldom maintains glycemi...