1990
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.64.3.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of repeat thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract: Thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction increases the risk of subsequent reocclusion of the infarct related artery. The efficacy and safety of repeat thrombolytic treatment was assessed in 31 patients treated with streptokinase (n = 13) or tissue plasminogen activator (n = 18) a median of five days (1-716) after the first infusion. The The benefits of repeat thrombolytic treatment for threatened reinfarction may resemble those of the initial administration, but the risks and benefits have not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Within a few days, the anti-SK titer rapidly rises to 50 to 100 times the preinfusion level, remaining there for many months or even years. 13 This makes repeated administration impractical except very early after initial dosing. A new recombinant preparation of SK has recently been demonstrated to possess a similar risk/benefit profile in acute myocardial patients compared with wild-type SK.…”
Section: Pharmacology and Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Within a few days, the anti-SK titer rapidly rises to 50 to 100 times the preinfusion level, remaining there for many months or even years. 13 This makes repeated administration impractical except very early after initial dosing. A new recombinant preparation of SK has recently been demonstrated to possess a similar risk/benefit profile in acute myocardial patients compared with wild-type SK.…”
Section: Pharmacology and Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although re-administration of throm bolytic agents could seem adequate, it is not free of severe side effects [7], so it is worth trying with nitroglycerin plus beta-blockers before. Further investigation is needed to ex tend these indications more widely, but it might be appropriate for most patients with prolonged ST-segment elevation refractory to conventional therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administration of thrombolytic agents in so early time is related to prevention of myo cardial infarction in 22-50% of cases [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failed reperfusion therapy may be rescued by acute adjunctive therapies, e.g. percutaneous coronary angioplasty or administration of additional thrombolytic drugs (3,4). It is therefore of major clinical importance to rapidly detect failed reperfusion in the acute phase because additional interventions could then be indicated to re-establish blood flow to the myocardium in jeopardy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%