2020
DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14105-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of Staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a prospective multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study may be underpowered to detect a smaller, yet clinically significant, difference that may be important in high‐risk patients Nonetheless, absolute reductions at magnitudes of 25% [24], 30% [23] and 33% [25], and relative reductions of 60% [23], 66% [21] and 68.7% [25] were deemed as significant effect size estimates by recent studies assessing HFNO in similar patient populations during advanced endoscopy [21]. While the hypoxaemia estimates in our low‐flow nasal plus mouthguard oxygen group were based on existing data, [2–5] similar estimates were not available for the HFNO group, therefore we estimated a hypoxaemia rate of 5.4%. Although the observed hypoxaemia rate in our HFNO group (7.6%) was closer to our prediction, the incidence in the low‐flow nasal plus mouthguard oxygen group was much lower than that in the cited literature (9.1% vs. 21.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study may be underpowered to detect a smaller, yet clinically significant, difference that may be important in high‐risk patients Nonetheless, absolute reductions at magnitudes of 25% [24], 30% [23] and 33% [25], and relative reductions of 60% [23], 66% [21] and 68.7% [25] were deemed as significant effect size estimates by recent studies assessing HFNO in similar patient populations during advanced endoscopy [21]. While the hypoxaemia estimates in our low‐flow nasal plus mouthguard oxygen group were based on existing data, [2–5] similar estimates were not available for the HFNO group, therefore we estimated a hypoxaemia rate of 5.4%. Although the observed hypoxaemia rate in our HFNO group (7.6%) was closer to our prediction, the incidence in the low‐flow nasal plus mouthguard oxygen group was much lower than that in the cited literature (9.1% vs. 21.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moderate to deep sedation is most frequently used, with general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation employed for selected patients [1]. Hypoxaemia may occur during propofol sedation for ERCP, with reported rates ranging from 15 to 21%, [2][3][4][5] with one study reporting a 60% incidence [6]. In these five studies, hypoxaemia was inconsistently defined and study populations were heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation