2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12187479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Turbo Roundabout with Simulations Based on the Lujiazui Roundabout in Shanghai

Abstract: Traditional multilane roundabouts have many branch lanes without traffic signs and channelization, which leads to a high tendency for traffic collisions. Turbo roundabouts are a new design that has the potential to reduce lane-change conflicts using canalization to force drivers to keep in specific lanes based on their intended destination. This paper evaluates the safety and efficiency performance of turbo roundabouts for the case of a five-leg roundabout called Lujiazui in Shanghai and provides design and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chenwei and Xiaodan (2017) Izadi et al (2016); Dabiri et al (2020) assert that when conventional and turbo roundabouts are compared to conventional roundabouts in different scenarios with respect to performance of delay time, capacity and level of service, in case that the diameter of the four-leg turbo roundabout is increased, the performance of the conventional roundabout decreases but the performance of the three-leg turbo roundabout increases. Liu et al, (2020) conclude that when turbo roundabouts with different central island diameters are designed, the performance of the roundabout can change according to the number of legs. Also, in a study carried out by Elhassy et al (2020) in Doha, a city of Qatar, three modified versions of rotor turbo roundabouts were designed and compared to the conventional roundabout in terms of capacity, queuing, delay time.…”
Section: Alternative Roundabout Types and Their Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Chenwei and Xiaodan (2017) Izadi et al (2016); Dabiri et al (2020) assert that when conventional and turbo roundabouts are compared to conventional roundabouts in different scenarios with respect to performance of delay time, capacity and level of service, in case that the diameter of the four-leg turbo roundabout is increased, the performance of the conventional roundabout decreases but the performance of the three-leg turbo roundabout increases. Liu et al, (2020) conclude that when turbo roundabouts with different central island diameters are designed, the performance of the roundabout can change according to the number of legs. Also, in a study carried out by Elhassy et al (2020) in Doha, a city of Qatar, three modified versions of rotor turbo roundabouts were designed and compared to the conventional roundabout in terms of capacity, queuing, delay time.…”
Section: Alternative Roundabout Types and Their Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, using the CSI index to evaluate the collision's severity is also necessary. TTC and Max-delta V are collision-related indexes, and based on their relationship, the CSI index can be calculated as shown in (7) [54].…”
Section: Safety Evaluation 451 Selection Of Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the capacity of the conventional three-lane roundabout was higher than the capacity of the turbo-roundabouts, concluding that turbo-roundabouts are not suitable for intersections with traffic volumes exceeding 4500 vehicles per hour. Liu et al (2020) evaluated the safety and traffic performance of turboroundabouts for a five-branch roundabout in Shanghai. The authors built VISSIM models for the roundabout and the proposed turbo-roundabout, performing several tests under diverse traffic volumes and central island radius.…”
Section: Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%