2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radial or brachial artery access is also feasible for endovascular treatment of the iliac arteries – most currently available peripheral balloons and stents can reach the proximal to mid iliac arteries if the left radial artery is used for sheath access. 23 , 24 …”
Section: Technical Aspects Of Iliac Artery Endovascular Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial or brachial artery access is also feasible for endovascular treatment of the iliac arteries – most currently available peripheral balloons and stents can reach the proximal to mid iliac arteries if the left radial artery is used for sheath access. 23 , 24 …”
Section: Technical Aspects Of Iliac Artery Endovascular Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In only a few cases did unsuccessful transbrachial recanalization require a TFA. Because of the unique anatomic characteristics of iliac vessels, a dual arterial access approach can often be required, 11,18 not only in cases of primary brachial artery access but also when a TFA is the first choice, especially for the treatment of extensive disease. 6,11,12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,24-27 However, the transradial access was applied in only a few cases of complex iliac disease, 24 as the presence of TASC II D lesions was considered an exclusion criterion for this approach. 18,24,27 Furthermore, in contrast to a brachial approach, 22 the lack of adequate equipment makes the simultaneous treatment of concomitant infrainguinal lesions via a transradial approach impossible. Finally, the reported incidence of radial artery occlusion (5%–16%) following endovascular procedures remains relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9e12 Current challenges for widespread use of radial access for peripheral interventions include limited catheter lengths, specific learning curve, and the inherent limitations of using bulky devices with radial or ulnar arteries. 1,9,10,12,13 However, several groups have reported their experience with carotid stenting and radial access. 2,5,11,12 Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting also offers minimal contact with catheter and aortic arch, which may reduce the risk of stroke, especially with right internal carotid or bovine left internal carotid artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%