2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people with gastrointestinal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall seropositivity rate of anti-RBD-IgG and NAb in cancer patients was significantly lower than in healthy controls, and it was also lower than in previous studies of mRNA vaccines and inactivated vaccines ( 21 ), which could be attributed to the difference in vaccine type, cancer type, antibody testing kits, and interval time after full-course vaccination. Moreover, a continuously decay of antibody titers was observed with time in both ER cancer patients and healthy controls, which was similar to the results of previous longitudinal studies ( 17 , 22 , 23 ). Furthermore, the decrease in anti-RBD-IgG was particularly obvious in the cancer population; the results indicated that vaccine protection in patients with ER cancer may be weakened faster than in healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall seropositivity rate of anti-RBD-IgG and NAb in cancer patients was significantly lower than in healthy controls, and it was also lower than in previous studies of mRNA vaccines and inactivated vaccines ( 21 ), which could be attributed to the difference in vaccine type, cancer type, antibody testing kits, and interval time after full-course vaccination. Moreover, a continuously decay of antibody titers was observed with time in both ER cancer patients and healthy controls, which was similar to the results of previous longitudinal studies ( 17 , 22 , 23 ). Furthermore, the decrease in anti-RBD-IgG was particularly obvious in the cancer population; the results indicated that vaccine protection in patients with ER cancer may be weakened faster than in healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, we first evaluated the short-term safety profile, and the results indicated that the overall incidence of AEs in patients with ER cancer within 7 days was similar to that of healthy controls, which was consistent with earlier studies ( 14 16 ). However, it was higher than our previous study in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (26.14% vs. 22.29%) ( 17 ), which suggests that different types of vaccines and cancers can contribute to this discrepancy. Furthermore, most of the AEs were mild and no vaccine-related serious AEs were reported in this study, which was consistent with earlier studies ( 9 , 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, we found that the frequency of aytMBCs increased significantly over time after primary vaccination in AILD patients. AtyMBCs are short-lived activated cells with low binding to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 23 and was also increased in patients with common variable immunodeficiency, 42 solid tumors, 43 and severe liver diseases. 27 This indicated that the immune memory function was damaged over time in patients with AILD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of the conventional inactivated vaccination is often poor, and moderate side effects have been noted. 3 It would be interesting to discuss the safety of the more recent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for cancer patients who have previously had COVID-19. If the participants' pre-existing immunological status is frequently evaluated, it is feasible to forecast the outcomes of receiving the COVID-19 immunization more accurately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%