Introduction Despite the growing evidence base for psychotropic drug
treatment in pediatric patients, knowledge about the benefit-risk ratio in
clinical practice remains limited. The ‘Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
(TDM)-VIGIL’ study aimed to evaluate serious adverse drug reactions
(ADRs) in children and adolescents treated with antidepressants and/or
antipsychotics in approved (‘on-label’), and off-label use in
clinical practice.
Methods Psychiatric pediatric patients aged 6-18 years treated with
antidepressants and/or antipsychotics either on-label or off-label were
prospectively followed between October 2014 and December 2018 within a
multicenter trial. Follow-up included standardized assessments of response,
serious ADRs and therapeutic drug monitoring.
Results 710 youth (age=14.6±2.2 years,
female=66.6%) were observed for 5.5 months on average;
76.3% received antidepressants, 47.5% antipsychotics, and
25.2% both. Altogether, 55.2% of the treatment episodes with
antidepressants and 80.7% with antipsychotics were off-label. Serious
ADRs occurred in 8.3% (95%CI=6.4–10.6%)
of patients, mainly being psychiatric adverse reactions (77.4%),
predominantly suicidal ideation and behavior. The risk of serious ADRs was not
significantly different between patients using psychotropics off-label and
on-label (antidepressants: 8.1% vs. 11.3%, p=0.16;
antipsychotics: 8.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.67). Serious ADRs
occurred in 16.6% of patients who were suicidal at enrollment versus
5.6% of patients who were not suicidal (relative risk 3.0,
95%CI=1.9-4.9).
Conclusion Off-label use of antidepressants and antipsychotics in youth
was not a risk factor for the occurrence of serious ADRs in a closely monitored
clinical setting. Results from large naturalistic trials like ours can
contribute to bridging the gap between knowledge from randomized controlled
trials and real-world clinical settings.