2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety assessment of buried pressurized gas pipelines subject to blasting vibrations induced by metro foundation pit excavation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e particle vibration frequencies of 45.25-120.5 Hz at each monitoring point obtained by numerical simulations are slightly higher than those obtained by in situ monitoring points. e main reason for the above phenomenon is that the particle vibration frequencies of the numerical simulations are obtained without considering the attenuation and dissipation of the blasting seismic waves caused by joints and weakening faces in the rock mass [28,29]. In summary, the comparison between numerical simulation and field monitoring data shows that the three-dimensional model and model parameters adequately describe the field data.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e particle vibration frequencies of 45.25-120.5 Hz at each monitoring point obtained by numerical simulations are slightly higher than those obtained by in situ monitoring points. e main reason for the above phenomenon is that the particle vibration frequencies of the numerical simulations are obtained without considering the attenuation and dissipation of the blasting seismic waves caused by joints and weakening faces in the rock mass [28,29]. In summary, the comparison between numerical simulation and field monitoring data shows that the three-dimensional model and model parameters adequately describe the field data.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologically, soft soil layer is characterized by high natural water content, large pore ratio, high compressibility, low shear strength, and high sensitivity, which makes it an undesirable geological body in constructional engineering [6][7][8][9][10]. e rapid development of China's economics put forward higher and higher requirements for the construction of urban architecture, transportation, and others, and the majority of the engineering construction cannot do without the foundation pit support [11][12][13][14][15]. ere are numerous supporting forms for foundation pit, among which pile-anchor support is the most commonly used [16][17][18][19][20], whereas it plays small role in soft soil layer, because the bonding strength between soft soil and bolt body is low and the bolt can provide low pulling resistance due to the special properties of soft soil, which therefore leads to overlong bolt and dense spacing of bolts in soft soil foundation pit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xia et al [20] calculated the vibration response of buried flexible HDPE pipes under impact loads based on the Winkler model and the Timoshenko beam theory. Recently, Jiang et al [21][22][23] studied the dynamic failure behavior of buried cast iron gas pipeline subjected to blasting vibration. In order to simplify the analysis, most of these studies approximately regard blasting seismic waves as plane waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%