2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3013671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Assessment of Emergency Training for Industrial Accident Scenarios Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Gray-Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment

Abstract: To evaluate the safety of emergency training for industrial accident scenarios, an approach combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and gray-fuzzy evaluation is proposed. According to the characteristics of industrial emergency training scenarios, a safety evaluation index system for this training is constructed from four aspects: human, machine, environment, and management. The index weight is established using the AHP and the evaluation model is established base of the gray-fuzzy evaluation method. Based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas L. Saaty enhanced the analytic network technique based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Huang et al, 2020), which is an evaluation approach that combines qualitative and quantitative analysis. ANP can take into account the internal connections between nodes of various factor groups in a more thorough way than the classic AHP, which merely stresses the flaws of reciprocal impact across criteria levels (Kundu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas L. Saaty enhanced the analytic network technique based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Huang et al, 2020), which is an evaluation approach that combines qualitative and quantitative analysis. ANP can take into account the internal connections between nodes of various factor groups in a more thorough way than the classic AHP, which merely stresses the flaws of reciprocal impact across criteria levels (Kundu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at the key scientific problem of emergency response capability evaluation of oil refining and chemical enterprises, researchers had carried out a lot of work on this subject. Abbassinia et al adopted the fuzzy hierarchical analysis and the fuzzy TOPSIS technique to prioritize the criteria of emergency scenarios for corrective actions, and the emergency situations of the petrochemical industry were prioritized due to the weight of these criteria [7] [8]. Han et al selected the vapor pressure, median lethal concentration, combustibility and explosibility, popularity and detection frequency as the risk assessment index for the chemicals in Shenyang Chemical Industrial Park, the weight from each assessment indicator on the surveillance levels for those chemicals was identified, and the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation was adopted to work out the surveillance assessment level for each chemical in SCIP [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation have been used to study emergency rescue in more detail. For example, Zhang et al [30] used AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to establish an assessment indicator system of emergency plans for business production safety accidents. Jing et al [31] used AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to build a competency model of railway earthquake emergency rescue personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) There is a lack of research on the competency of full-time water conservancy emergency rescue teams. Scholars have studied fire [35][36][37], safety accidents [28,30] and other emergencies. Considering the special nature of water conservancy, including factors such as seasonality and continuity, research on the competency of full-time water conservancy emergency rescue teams is very important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation