2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08915-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Assurance of Open Adaptive Systems – A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Trapp and Schneider (2014) have built on top of Rushby's suggestions and they suggest different possible approaches, where the traditional safety engineering is increasingly transferred to runtime for increased flexibility at the cost of increased complexity. The simplest case is the so called safety certificate at runtime-approach, where subsystems check for assumptions and demands for safe integration.…”
Section: Safety Of Open Adaptive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Trapp and Schneider (2014) have built on top of Rushby's suggestions and they suggest different possible approaches, where the traditional safety engineering is increasingly transferred to runtime for increased flexibility at the cost of increased complexity. The simplest case is the so called safety certificate at runtime-approach, where subsystems check for assumptions and demands for safe integration.…”
Section: Safety Of Open Adaptive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the potential capability to reduce the uncertainties, model@run.time methods are attracting more and more attention. The survey [ 191 ] introduced the model@run.time methods for open adaptive systems (OAS) and analyzed the state-of-the-art safety assurance solutions and challenges of model@run.time. The model@run.time methods were classified into four types: safetycertificates@run.time, safetycases@run.time, V&V model@run.time, and hazard analysis and risk assessment@run.time, where safetycase@run.time is a formalized, modular safety case, which can be interpreted and adapted at runtime.…”
Section: The Safety Of Self-adaptation Strategies and The Dependabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mario et al argued that “safetycases@run.time appears to be sufficient to support the assurance of a wide range of application scenarios of Open Adaptive Systems (OAS) in safety-critical applications” [ 191 ]. However, in our point of view, safetycases@run.time is not enough to guarantee the safety of SCPS.…”
Section: The Safety Of Self-adaptation Strategies and The Dependabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models@Run.Time [5] provides a particularly interesting basis for self-adaptation as it makes adaptations tangible and explicit, which is of utmost importance for safety assurance. In previous work, we therefore introduced the idea of safety models at runtime (SM@RT), which can be used to assure the safety of adaptive systems [2,4,10].…”
Section: Safety Models At <>mentioning
confidence: 99%