2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety climate of a commercial airline: A cross-sectional comparison of four occupational groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also supports similar studies conducted in the airline environment where junior flight crew perceived a more positive safety climate than their senior colleagues (Gao et al, 2013;Gao, Bruce, & Rajendran, 2015). Compared with the effect of training experience measured by flight hours, which was not found to be significant, it is worth noting that in a tertiary aviation program, students' learning and teaching activities are organized by year groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It also supports similar studies conducted in the airline environment where junior flight crew perceived a more positive safety climate than their senior colleagues (Gao et al, 2013;Gao, Bruce, & Rajendran, 2015). Compared with the effect of training experience measured by flight hours, which was not found to be significant, it is worth noting that in a tertiary aviation program, students' learning and teaching activities are organized by year groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Safety is important in a high-risk industry such as the aviation industry. Gao et al (2015) found that safety climate of the commercial airline under investigation was perceived to be strong across all four professions (pilots, cabin crew, engineers and ground operations). Respondents were willing to report incidences, perceived a commitment of senior management toward safety, and felt they had access to current safety-related information.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent extensive review of the safety climate literature drawing on 494 articles Bamel et al (2020) suggest that existing studies emphasize two distinct antecedents, either leadership and management or perceptions of safety rules, resources, risk, and employee involvement. Since Zohar's early work, many different safety climate scales have been developed for use in surveys of employees (e.g., Glendon & Litherland, 2001;Evans et al, 2007;Kines et al, 2011;Gao et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2018). Typically, safety climate scales assess employees' perceptions of these two antecedents through such measures as management commitment to safety, safety communication, work pressures, safety training and safety rules, procedures, and policies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety climate perceptions have been investigated among different professional groups within aviation, for example amongst commercial pilots in Australia (Evans et al, 2007;Gao et al, 2015), ground handlers in Spain (Diaz & Cabrera, 1997), and also personnel in aviation maintenance organizations in Ireland (McDonald, et al, 2000). While the aviation sector strongly supports a global standard for safety (ICAO, 2006a), the national culture of the countries in the aforementioned studies is relatively similar, and none of them are LMICs.…”
Section: Aircraft Maintenance Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation