Safety climate, safety climate strength, and length of stay in the NICU

Abstract

BackgroundSafety climate is an important marker of patient safety attitudes within health care units, but the significance of intra-unit variation of safety climate perceptions (safety climate strength) is poorly understood. This study sought to examine the standard safety climate measure (percent positive response (PPR)) and safety climate strength in relation to length of stay (LOS) of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants within California neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).MethodsObservational study of safety climate from 2073 health care providers in 44 NICUs. Consistent perceptions among a NICU’s respondents, i.e., safety climate strength, was determined via intra-unit standard deviation of safety climate scores. The relation between safety climate PPR, safety climate strength, and LOS among VLBW (< 1500 g) infants was evaluated using log-linear regression. Secondary outcomes were infections, chronic lung disease, and mortality.ResultsNICUs had safety climate PPRs of 66 ± 12%, intra-unit standard deviations 11 (strongest) to 23 (weakest), and median LOS 60 days. NICUs with stronger climates had LOS 4 days shorter than those with weaker climates. In interaction modeling, NICUs with weak climates and low PPR had the longest LOS, NICUs with strong climates and low PPR had the shortest LOS, and NICUs with high PPR (both strong and weak) had intermediate LOS. Stronger climates were associated with lower odds of infections, but not with other secondary outcomes.ConclusionsSafety climate strength is independently associated with LOS and moderates the association between PPR and LOS among VLBW infants. Strength and PPR together provided better prediction than PPR alone, capturing variance in outcomes missed by PPR. Evaluations of NICU safety climate consider both positivity (PPR) and consistency of responses (strength) across individuals.

Safety climate of UAE petroleum industry: a cross-validation using confirmatory factor analytic approach

“…A factor reduction using EFA led to the identification of OCS, supervisory commitment to safety, TOS, employee engagement to safety and HSE compliance as the dimensions of safety climate. These findings complement the results of previous studies that identified safety climate and perception of process safety as employee engagement to safety, employee safety performance and safe working environment (Mazrouei et al , 2019; Probst, 2015; Roughton et al , 2019; Tawfik et al , 2019). Our findings are in line with Griffin and Curcuruto (2016) and Naik (2019), who found that safety climate is a shared concept which results from individuals’ shared insights and observations of different ways that safety is valued in the organization.…”

Assessment of Workplace Safety Climate among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Case Study of Nigeria

“…As such, the benchmarking of the safety climate within healthcare facilities is now a focus, especially in developed countries that include the United Kingdom, USA, etc. [20,21].…”

Patient Safety Culture in Nurses in Karawang, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…This study found that nurse who are working at surgical department has the lowest score of patient safety culture. Surgical departments, including operating rooms, anesthesia units, obstetrics and gynecology departments, and other surgical units, are high hazard settings with a high potential for patient harm [28]. Over half of all hospitals, adverse events (34.35 to 83%) occur in surgical settings [29].The safety culture in these departments has been measured in certain studies.…”