2019
DOI: 10.1177/0193945919848755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Culture and Patient Safety Outcomes in East Asia: A Literature Review

Abstract: This review examined associations between safety culture aspects and patient safety outcomes in East Asian hospitals and identified relevant research priorities. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, 16 articles were identified for review. Patient safety nursing activity was the most commonly investigated outcome in relation to safety culture aspects. Among safety culture aspects, feedback and communication, frequency of event reporting, teamwork within units,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
36
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The status of patient cultural safety in Southeast Asian countries was highlighted in this review. Most studies used either the HSOPSC or the SAQ to measure safety culture, which mirrored previous findings ( 11 ). Ten Vietnamese hospitals used the HSOPSC, and the average percentage outcome for safety culture was positive (58.9%), which was less than that reported among American hospitals ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The status of patient cultural safety in Southeast Asian countries was highlighted in this review. Most studies used either the HSOPSC or the SAQ to measure safety culture, which mirrored previous findings ( 11 ). Ten Vietnamese hospitals used the HSOPSC, and the average percentage outcome for safety culture was positive (58.9%), which was less than that reported among American hospitals ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, patient safety culture was recognized as a key factor to improve patient safety ( 10 ) and quality of care in healthcare organizations, and the creation of safety culture was the first approach to guide healthcare providers into patient safety. Patient safety is explained as “the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of, and organization's health and safety management;” however, the measurement of patient safety has varied in previous research and several recommendations have been made to develop a standard measurement tool on patient safety ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare organizations in Korea have made attempts to assess safety culture, but there has been no universal, validated tool for this purpose. Although translations of the original HSOPSC 1.0 or its modified versions have been commonly used to measure patient safety culture in Korea [6], the authors of those studies have failed to identify the instrument's psychometric properties [7]. Moreover, a recent psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the HSOPSC 1.0 [8] revealed that six of the 12 dimensions had internal consistency values below 0.70, with the lowest four Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.31 to 0.55.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Sholl et al, (2019) claimed that staff nurses' lack of competence and professionalism creates a great impact on the patients' safety in terms of physical, emotional and psychological aspects. Openness in communication is statistically significant with an enhancement of safety culture and that the patients must demonstrate active engagement in this process (Ansari et al, 2019;Chegini et al, 2019;Lee and Quinn, 2019). Communication in clinical settings is so vital that it must be practiced in all areas of care plans including medication management, such as medical reconciliation even in complex areas (Manias et al, 2019;Martyn et al, 2019;Stark et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%