2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety, efficacy and immunogenicity evaluation of the SAG2 oral rabies vaccine in Formosan ferret badgers

Abstract: Since 2013, rabies cases have been reported among Formosan ferret badgers in Taiwan, and they have been shown to be the major reservoirs for Taiwanese enzootics. To control and eradicate rabies, the authorities plan to implement a vaccination programme. Before distributing live vaccines in the field, this study assessed the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of SAG2 vaccine on ferret badgers by direct oral instillation. After application of 109 TCID50/dose, no virus was excreted into the oral cavity 1–7 days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous reports [ 12 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 41 ], we demonstrate comparable long-term (365 dpv) rabies immunity in foxes after intramuscular and oral application using a third-generation oral rabies virus vaccine, i.e., SPBN GASGAS. The humoral immune response resembles those reported in previous studies with the same and other modified live virus vaccines ( Figure 1 ) [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 48 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. With the exception of two animals, there was no difference in binding antibody ( Figure 1 B,D) and VNA response ( Figure 1 A,C) between both vaccinated groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Consistent with previous reports [ 12 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 41 ], we demonstrate comparable long-term (365 dpv) rabies immunity in foxes after intramuscular and oral application using a third-generation oral rabies virus vaccine, i.e., SPBN GASGAS. The humoral immune response resembles those reported in previous studies with the same and other modified live virus vaccines ( Figure 1 ) [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 48 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. With the exception of two animals, there was no difference in binding antibody ( Figure 1 B,D) and VNA response ( Figure 1 A,C) between both vaccinated groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results proved the induction of a specific immune response at three weeks p.v., which remained at a very high level up to 12 months p.v. The strong increase in rabies antibody levels immediately after challenge was the result of a booster effect to the challenge virus (Figure 1), as also observed in other efficacy studies [67,74,79,80]. In other studies, no indication of a booster effect after administration of the challenge virus could be found [68,69].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Understanding the key sources responsible for rabies epizootics and identifying host switches can have concrete implications on the implementation of rabies control measures in animals, as well as on the strategy of animal vaccination towards the ultimate goal of elimination (Fusaro et al, 2013;Un et al, 2012). In fact, rabies vaccination in wildlife requires specific strategies and stakeholder involvement (Freuling et al, 2013, Hsu et al, 2017, Müller et al, 2015, Wallace et al, 2018, which are different from those applied for infected dogs (Fahrion et al, 2017;Lembo, 2012). In Iran and the Middle East, rabies has been reported in many wild carnivore species such as foxes, golden jackals, wolves and martens (Janani et al, 2008;Picot et al, 2017;Seimenis, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%