2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2020.2984719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Enhancement for Real-Time Parallel Applications in Distributed Automotive Embedded Systems: A Stable Stopping Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2020, Guoqi Xie, Gang Zeng, and Renfa Li. [3] develop a safety mechanism to handle the error of safety-critical automotive applications within its deadline. In the creation of automobiles, the main thing is protected driving.…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, Guoqi Xie, Gang Zeng, and Renfa Li. [3] develop a safety mechanism to handle the error of safety-critical automotive applications within its deadline. In the creation of automobiles, the main thing is protected driving.…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is no need to have a higher clock speed, as discussed in the research [3]. Optimizing inter-core resource sharing distributed among software application components, presented by Schliecker et al [4], minimizes the computing power by avoiding concurrent accesses of wait-states to the shared resources with the expense of independent data processing and parallelization losses [5]. Thus, system architectures experiencing highperformance data processing and computation have been trending to be real-time mixed-criticality multicore processor platforms, as interpreted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed safety critical systems have been affecting with the coexistence, where software components (SWCs), even their sub-functions, usually have mixed-ASIL. Hence, interferences from Quality Management (QM) or lower-ASIL SWCs will be introduced [6][7][8][9]. They may corrupt higher-ASIL safetyrelated SWCs by means of information exchange interference, memory interference, real-time interference, and shared peripheral interference as represented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%