2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety evaluation of the HTTR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this event, the overheating of RPV by the hot primary coolant which might flow up from the core by natural convection is a main concern. In HTTR, it was evaluated that the RPV temperature can be maintained lower than the temperature limit in the event of LOFC by the thermal shield equipped at the top head hemispherical closure of RPV [20]. The temperature limit of RPV of HTR50S in the event of AOO (e.g., loss of off-site power) decreases relatively largely, from 500 ∘ C of HTTR to 425 ∘ C, by the design change of RPV material from 2.25Cr-1Mo steel used for HTTR to Mn-Mo steel, whereas the reduction of temperature limit of RPV is from 550 ∘ C of HTTR to 540 ∘ C in the event of the accident.…”
Section: Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this event, the overheating of RPV by the hot primary coolant which might flow up from the core by natural convection is a main concern. In HTTR, it was evaluated that the RPV temperature can be maintained lower than the temperature limit in the event of LOFC by the thermal shield equipped at the top head hemispherical closure of RPV [20]. The temperature limit of RPV of HTR50S in the event of AOO (e.g., loss of off-site power) decreases relatively largely, from 500 ∘ C of HTTR to 425 ∘ C, by the design change of RPV material from 2.25Cr-1Mo steel used for HTTR to Mn-Mo steel, whereas the reduction of temperature limit of RPV is from 550 ∘ C of HTTR to 540 ∘ C in the event of the accident.…”
Section: Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation results were described in Section 3 in the same Nuclear Engineering and Design issues (Kunitomi et al, 2004). Table 6b Selected events for accidents Channel blockage in fuel block ACD-2 Rupture of inner pipe of concentric pipe in primary cooling system ACD-3…”
Section: Selection Of Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety evaluation of the HTTR proved that the fuel failure by temperature increase and oxidation is limited even in the hypothetical accident (Kunitomi et al, 2004). This was well understood technically by the regulatory members, however it was pointed out that it would take another couple of years to re-examine the implementation of no containment vessel reactors.…”
Section: Containment Vesselmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs) have characteristics of 4th generation reactors, it is especially excellent in the safety features [1][2][3]. These safety features have already been sufficiently demonstrated [4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%