2018
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1537501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety first? Production pressures and the implications on safety and health

Abstract: The prominence of production, schedule, cost and economic wellbeing in government policy and review is explored and contrasted with the status of safety. The connection between productivity as an objective and safety as a constraint is reviewed, though it can be concluded that in spite of widespread belief of a connection there is very little empirical causal evidence for high production pressure causing negative effects on safety. Nevertheless, the inverse is mooted, that high levels of safety has had a negat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concerns raised by the respondents about conflicts between productivity and safety are especially concerning but supports other recent research which has highlighted this problem of competing institutional production and safety logics (see Smith [ 44 ]). According to Crumbley [ 45 ], management commitment to an organization’s OHS program communicates the message that safety is valued as a primary priority, even at the expense of productivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concerns raised by the respondents about conflicts between productivity and safety are especially concerning but supports other recent research which has highlighted this problem of competing institutional production and safety logics (see Smith [ 44 ]). According to Crumbley [ 45 ], management commitment to an organization’s OHS program communicates the message that safety is valued as a primary priority, even at the expense of productivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In Hofstede’s research, Indonesia is classified as a collectivist culture where people emphasize work group goals above individual needs or desires [ 65 ]. Furthermore, recent research by Smith [ 44 ] points to the tensions that can exist between the production and safety institutional logics that exist in construction projects which coupled with Indonesia’s collectivist culture, is likely to mean that workers will tend to follow the orders of supervisors to complete the job within budget and program and if necessary put personal safety aside as a secondary consideration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean scores (MSs) and standard deviations were used to describe the scale. The series of questions combined in the scale were derived from past studies on construction safety (please see Darabont et al, 2019, Dekker, 2019Emuze, 2020;Sherratt, 2016;Smith, 2019). For instance, problematic behaviour in this study is described as 'unsafe acts' by Reason (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lingard, Pink, et al, 2015;Oswald et al, 2018). On the other hand, several studies have done research on how to improve industrial hygiene by establishing a good work environment by improving construction project management in building sites (Borgheipour et al, 2020;Kearney et al, 2017;Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Keyword Co-occurrence Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%