2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-008-9076-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety in Human Research: Past Problems and Current Challenges from a Canadian Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aspects of this topic include: (a) governance of ethics review (Emanuel, Wendler, Killen & Grady, 2004;McDonald, 2001); (b) accounts of serious violations of human dignity and calls for more vigilant and comprehensive oversight (Schwartz, 2008); (c) analyses of the efficacy of consent forms (Flory & Emanuel, 2004;Sugarman, McCrory, Powell, Krasny, Adams, Ball, & Cassell, 1999); (d) descriptions of research ethics education on an international scale (Schuklenk & Ashcroft, 2000); (e) proposals for the improvement of research ethics education (Eisen & Parker, 2004); and (f) advocacy for a more streamlined approach (Gordon & Parsi, 2002) including the creation of SoTL based principles for using students as participants (Hutchings, 2002(Hutchings, , 2003MacLean & Poole, 2010). This body of literature has been perceived as "incoherent" (Pimple, 2002).…”
Section: Overview Of Ethics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspects of this topic include: (a) governance of ethics review (Emanuel, Wendler, Killen & Grady, 2004;McDonald, 2001); (b) accounts of serious violations of human dignity and calls for more vigilant and comprehensive oversight (Schwartz, 2008); (c) analyses of the efficacy of consent forms (Flory & Emanuel, 2004;Sugarman, McCrory, Powell, Krasny, Adams, Ball, & Cassell, 1999); (d) descriptions of research ethics education on an international scale (Schuklenk & Ashcroft, 2000); (e) proposals for the improvement of research ethics education (Eisen & Parker, 2004); and (f) advocacy for a more streamlined approach (Gordon & Parsi, 2002) including the creation of SoTL based principles for using students as participants (Hutchings, 2002(Hutchings, , 2003MacLean & Poole, 2010). This body of literature has been perceived as "incoherent" (Pimple, 2002).…”
Section: Overview Of Ethics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%