2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety management – A multi-level control problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They propose using a control metaphor for the design and assessment of SMS in combination with the concepts of man, technology and organizational and information systems (MTOI) to ensure the continued safety of the operated systems. Wahlström and Rollenhagen [45] further elaborate how this control metaphor, that initially focuses on the safe management of sharp end activities, can also be used for controlling the MTOI systems, as well as different safety management activities, Together, the implementing and controlling stages define the formal as well as the informal side of safety management and have a direct influence on performance. This representation of the core attributes for safely managing an activity is aligned with the common approach for modelling systems, subsystems and their interactions, as proposed by Wahlström and Rollenhagen [45].…”
Section: The Resulting Safety Fractalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose using a control metaphor for the design and assessment of SMS in combination with the concepts of man, technology and organizational and information systems (MTOI) to ensure the continued safety of the operated systems. Wahlström and Rollenhagen [45] further elaborate how this control metaphor, that initially focuses on the safe management of sharp end activities, can also be used for controlling the MTOI systems, as well as different safety management activities, Together, the implementing and controlling stages define the formal as well as the informal side of safety management and have a direct influence on performance. This representation of the core attributes for safely managing an activity is aligned with the common approach for modelling systems, subsystems and their interactions, as proposed by Wahlström and Rollenhagen [45].…”
Section: The Resulting Safety Fractalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were divided into 4 groups of 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, and more than 50 years of age based on their age, and 3 groups of less than 10 years (frequency of 96, 40%), [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Moreover, the results revealed that there is a positive, meaningful relationship between the safety management system and its components (safety policy, employees' motives, safety education, urgent prevention programs, and internal control), and safety culture (Table 2) (P= 0.01). Furthermore, high education levels have meaningful effects on the safety management system (P=0.01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, danger analysis and safety engineering are considered as important activities in safety management. Danger analysis is the evaluation of different types of dangers, and safety engineering focuses on turning unacceptable dangers into acceptable threats (13). It is completely understandable that every single occupational incident, disease, and environmental harm causes many heavy, direct and indirect damages to the organizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety management is a multi-level control problem (Wahlstrom and Rollenhagen, 2014). Safety culture is identified to safety climate in the analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%