2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04833-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety, metabolic and psychological outcomes of Medtronic MiniMed 670G in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was no difference in hypoglycemia time, the use of an HCL system was related to a decrease in HbA1c level and a greater number of patients who reached the HbA1c target level of < 7%. These findings are in line with previous systematic reviews that demonstrated the safety of different HCL devices without increased risk of hypoglycemia ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there was no difference in hypoglycemia time, the use of an HCL system was related to a decrease in HbA1c level and a greater number of patients who reached the HbA1c target level of < 7%. These findings are in line with previous systematic reviews that demonstrated the safety of different HCL devices without increased risk of hypoglycemia ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses including both adults and children have shown efficacy and safety of HCL over control therapies ( 18 20 ). However, these studies presented combined outcomes from children and adults, since analyses specifically focused on children were unfeasible ( 21 , 22 ). Thus, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCL treatment in children and adolescents with T1D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous generation of AID systems provided some benefits for users, but the frequent auto mode exits and user-input requirements presented a significant burden. The result was that the previous AID system was not effective regarding the improvement of psychosocial outcomes [ 11 ]. However, treatment satisfaction was significantly improved compared with that achieved with SAP + PLGM use [ 40 ] and MDI therapy [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implements a modified proportional–integral–derivative (PID) algorithm that automatically adjusts the basal insulin delivery rate to achieve a predetermined sensor glucose target of 120 mg/dL. Data from clinical trials and observational studies have shown an overall beneficial effect on glycaemic outcomes among paediatric and adult participants [ 11 ]. However, the need for more aggressive and efficient AID systems has arisen from the difficulty of maintaining sustained optimal glycaemic outcomes for many users [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to end this Editorial by focusing the readers’ attention on relevant data for clinical practice. Over the last 5 years, we passed from the HCL system (MiniMed 670G ® ), which allowed a TIR of approximately 65 to 70% and a TBR below 4% ( 9 ), to the new AHCL systems which allow a TIR of approximately 75% and a further reduction in TBR ( 10 , 11 ). Blood glucose control improves as fast as technologies for diabetes go on.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%