2009
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.101675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of biological therapies following rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Abstract: Objective: To assess the safety of biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients following rituximab. Methods: RA patients who participated in an international rituximab clinical trial programme were included. Patients who had received one or more rituximab courses and entered safety follow-up (SFU) were permitted additional biological DMARD. Serious infection events (SIE) were collected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown significant reductions in immunoglobulin levels and possibly selective suppression of autoantibodies after treatment. A single study has reported on a series of patients given a second biological agent after rituximab without obvious added toxicity 104. Long-term toxicity remains a matter for careful registry follow-up, although early indications are encouraging.…”
Section: Biological Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown significant reductions in immunoglobulin levels and possibly selective suppression of autoantibodies after treatment. A single study has reported on a series of patients given a second biological agent after rituximab without obvious added toxicity 104. Long-term toxicity remains a matter for careful registry follow-up, although early indications are encouraging.…”
Section: Biological Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switching from rituximab to a TNF inhibitor has been associated with a numerically, but not statistically, significant increase in serious infections in an early study;79 a subsequent report providing further follow-up of the same cohort did not suggest a major increase in infections under these circumstances 80. In this latter report TNF inhibitors were usually initiated at least 4 months after rituximab (when insufficient treatment response would be judged).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The targeting of alternative immune pathways following B-cell depletion was evaluated in a recent preliminary analysis that sought to determine whether such patients demonstrated increased serious infection events (SIEs) [59 ]. The rates (events per 100 patient-years) of SIE while on RTX, but before initiation of a biologic DMARD, were calculated and compared with rates after initiating a new biologic.…”
Section: Biologic Dmards After Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 99%