2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Case-Controlled Multicentre Registry Study

Abstract: Objective: Few studies have been published on the safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Registry reports have been recommended in order to gather large study groups.Design: A retrospective, registry based, case controlled study on prospectively gathered data from Sweden, the capital region of Finland, and from Denmark, including 30 days of follow up.Methods: The study group was a consecutive series of 5526 patients who had CEA for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis durin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, with the increasing number of stroke units, the question of a rapid revascularization of residual ICA stenosis after thrombolysis has emerged. Recent studies reported reassuring results but they were small population studies [25][26][27][28].Among the two neurological complications in our study, one was a postoperative stroke after thrombolysis and delayed CR. We believe early CR after thrombolysis should be considered, but larger series of patients are required to con irm the safety of such management.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Yet, with the increasing number of stroke units, the question of a rapid revascularization of residual ICA stenosis after thrombolysis has emerged. Recent studies reported reassuring results but they were small population studies [25][26][27][28].Among the two neurological complications in our study, one was a postoperative stroke after thrombolysis and delayed CR. We believe early CR after thrombolysis should be considered, but larger series of patients are required to con irm the safety of such management.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, this recommendation is supported by low- or very-low-quality evidence. 10 -15 Even though the half-life of the thrombolytic agent is only 3 to 5 minutes, IVT has been shown to induce a widespread response of the coagulation system persisting for up to 72 hours. Additionally, rt-PA may contribute to a hyperperfusion injury by influencing blood–brain barrier permeability and activating several inflammatory mediators and metalloproteinases, which all last considerably longer than the half-life of the thrombolytic agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the results of available studies support the indication that CEA can be performed safely within the recommended 2 weeks after onset of symptoms and IVT. 10 -15 However, studies focusing on emergency carotid artery thromboendarterectomy for severe acute ischemic stroke performed immediately after failed IVT with the aim to achieve neurological improvement by reperfusion of the ischemic penumbra are almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…248 The largest published series (202 cases) reported 30-day death/stroke rates of 3.4% among patients who underwent CEA <14 days of IVT, compared with 5.1% in those undergoing CEA <7 days. 249 It is essential, however, that CEA patients who undergo treatment within a few days of completing IVT are monitored carefully and treated actively for post-CEA hypertension (Section 2.6.1. 3.3).…”
Section: Timing Of Carotid Interventions After Intravenous Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%