“…Participants in previous studies also have reported visual changes and vertigo or dizziness following spinal manipulation or mobilization to the neck. [50][51][52][53] DCs in clinical and educational settings should monitor their patients for adverse events and document their occurrence. Doserelated studies of spinal mobilization and manipulation should assess whether participants receiving varied doses report differences in adverse events.…”
Objective: Doctors of chiropractic (DCs) use manual cervical distraction to treat patients with neck pain. Previous research demonstrates variability in traction forces generated by different DCs. This article reports on a training protocol and monthly certification process using bioengineering technology to standardize cervical traction force delivery among clinicians. Methods: This longitudinal observational study evaluated a training and certification process for DCs who provided force-based manual cervical distraction during a randomized clinical trial. The DCs completed a 7-week initial training that included instructional lectures, observation, and guided practice by a clinical expert, followed by 3 hours of weekly practice sessions delivering the technique to asymptomatic volunteers who served as simulated patients. An instrumentmodified table and computer software provided the DCs with real-time audible and visual feedback on the traction forces they generated and graphical displays of the magnitude of traction forces as a function of time immediately after the delivery of the treatment. The DCs completed monthly certifications on traction force delivery throughout the trial. Descriptive accounts of certification attempts are provided. Results: Two DCs achieved certification in traction force delivery over 10 consecutive months. No certification required more than 3 attempts at C5 and occiput contacts for 3 force ranges (0-20 N, 21-50 N, and 51-100 N). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a training protocol and certification process using bioengineering technology for training DCs to deliver manual cervical distraction within specified traction force ranges over a 10-month period.
“…Participants in previous studies also have reported visual changes and vertigo or dizziness following spinal manipulation or mobilization to the neck. [50][51][52][53] DCs in clinical and educational settings should monitor their patients for adverse events and document their occurrence. Doserelated studies of spinal mobilization and manipulation should assess whether participants receiving varied doses report differences in adverse events.…”
Objective: Doctors of chiropractic (DCs) use manual cervical distraction to treat patients with neck pain. Previous research demonstrates variability in traction forces generated by different DCs. This article reports on a training protocol and monthly certification process using bioengineering technology to standardize cervical traction force delivery among clinicians. Methods: This longitudinal observational study evaluated a training and certification process for DCs who provided force-based manual cervical distraction during a randomized clinical trial. The DCs completed a 7-week initial training that included instructional lectures, observation, and guided practice by a clinical expert, followed by 3 hours of weekly practice sessions delivering the technique to asymptomatic volunteers who served as simulated patients. An instrumentmodified table and computer software provided the DCs with real-time audible and visual feedback on the traction forces they generated and graphical displays of the magnitude of traction forces as a function of time immediately after the delivery of the treatment. The DCs completed monthly certifications on traction force delivery throughout the trial. Descriptive accounts of certification attempts are provided. Results: Two DCs achieved certification in traction force delivery over 10 consecutive months. No certification required more than 3 attempts at C5 and occiput contacts for 3 force ranges (0-20 N, 21-50 N, and 51-100 N). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a training protocol and certification process using bioengineering technology for training DCs to deliver manual cervical distraction within specified traction force ranges over a 10-month period.
“…Manual therapy to the neck, in particular rotational manipulation, has rarely been associated with serious adverse events related to the craniocervical vasculature, including arterial dissection and stroke (Thiel, Bolton et al 2007). Because the majority of cases occur in relatively young, healthy people with no known cardiovascular risk factors (Thomas, Rivett et al 2011), these complications are difficult to predict.…”
Please cite this article as: Thomas LC, McLeod LR, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, The effect of end-range cervical rotation on vertebral and internal carotid arterial blood flow and cerebral inflow: A sub analysis of an MRI study, Manual Therapy (2014),
“…An example from his book Trick or Treatment 4 is the risk of stroke incorrectly attributed to chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. 5,6 Whereas the impressive level of benefit reported in the Bristol Homeopathic Hospital clinical outcome study, discounted by Ernst for lack of controls, will signify effectiveness to the discerning GP, whatever its limits as a demonstration of efficacy. 7,4 A regrettable consequence of Ernst's polemic is to polarise attitudes to CAM when rapprochement would be more fruitful.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.