2020
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Consecutive Bilateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension and Occult CSF Leak

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Digital subtraction myelography performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position has the potential for increased sensitivity over prone-position myelography in the detection of spinal CSF-venous fistulas, a well-established cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. We report on the safety of performing routine, consecutive-day right and left lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography in these patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Type III spinal CSF leaks were first described in 2014 and are an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Because these type III leaks are considered to be slower in nature, they do not necessarily result in epidural fluid collections and can be more difficult to detect compared with types I and II CSF leaks. 15 Much has been previously described in the literature related to use of dynamic myelography, computed tomography myelography (CTM), and digital subtraction myelography to detect types I to III spinal CSF leaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3] Type III spinal CSF leaks were first described in 2014 and are an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Because these type III leaks are considered to be slower in nature, they do not necessarily result in epidural fluid collections and can be more difficult to detect compared with types I and II CSF leaks. 15 Much has been previously described in the literature related to use of dynamic myelography, computed tomography myelography (CTM), and digital subtraction myelography to detect types I to III spinal CSF leaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types I and II leaks are most common, with type III leaks being less common and underrecognized 1–3 . Type III spinal CSF leaks were first described in 2014 and are an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension 4–14 . Because these type III leaks are considered to be slower in nature, they do not necessarily result in epidural fluid collections and can be more difficult to detect compared with types I and II CSF leaks 15 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%