Safety of Diagnostic Cerebral and Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography in a Developing Country: A Single-Center Experience

Abstract

Background: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard imaging modality for cerebrovascular disorders. In contrast to developed countries, the safety of the procedure is not extensively reported from the developing countries. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of the basic technique, indications, and outcomes in 286 patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral and spinal angiography in a developing country, Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective review of patient demographics, procedural technique and complication rates of 286 consecutive patients undergoing the diagnostic cerebral/spinal angiography procedure at one institution from May 2013 to December 2015 was performed. Neurological, systemic, or local complications occurring within and after 24 h of the procedure were recorded. Results: Mean age reported for all patients was 49.7 years. Of all the 286 cases, 175 were male (61.2%) and the rest female (111, 38.8%). Cerebral DSA was performed in 279 cases (97.6%), with 7 cases of spinal DSA (2.4%). Subarachnoid hemorrhage was the most common indication for DSA accounting for 88 cases (30.8%), closely followed by stroke (26.6%) and arteriosclerotic vascular disease (23.1%). No intra- or post-procedural neurological complications of any severity were seen in any of the 286 cases. One case of asymptomatic aortic dissection was reported (0.3%) in the entire cohort of patient population. Conclusion: Diagnostic cerebral/spinal digital subtraction angiography was found to be safe in Pakistan, with complication rates at par with and comparable to those reported in the developed world.

Untitled Document

“…Hence ARB is proposed. The ARB is defined as: (6) where C donates convolution, ∥ represents concatenation of channel dimensions and W is the weight of the convolution. We use two axial convolutions to extract features in different directions and concatenate them in the channel dimension.…”

“…DSA. Furthermore, it offers imaging information for relevant interventional surgery that is superior to CTA and MRA [4]- [6]. In clinical, DSA images are acquired by subtracting live images (images contain the contrast agent) and mask images (images without the contrast agent) by using the Carm detector twice to eliminate the effect of bone and soft tissue structures, as shown in Fig.…”

Complications and Avoidance in Neurointerventional Surgery

“…Complications for diagnostic procedures are lower due to use of smaller-sized sheaths and shorter duration of procedure. 5,6 Wagenbach et al, in their recent series of almost 300 patients who underwent diagnostic and therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures, report a rate of 1% incidence of groin hematoma. 7 Severe groin hematomas require surgical intervention for definitive therapy, and if left untreated, may progress to retroperitoneal hematoma, which can be catastrophic.…”

Optical Imaging in the Second Near Infrared Window for Vascular Bioimaging

“…[5] DSA has the disadvantages of strong invasion, adverse effects, and low temporal resolution although it provides higher spatial resolution. [6] 2) Optical imaging technologies, such as fluorescence imaging, photoacoustic imaging (PAI), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can provide great merits including noninvasive, safe, high contrast, and high spatiotemporal resolution, which have been widely used in microvascular distribution and perfusion analysis. [7] However, traditional optical imaging window is difficult to monitor the variation of blood vessels distribution and blood flow in deep tissues, because it (visible and the first near infrared region: 380-900 nm) is affected by great light scattering, light absorption, and autofluorescence in biological tissues, leading to limited imaging spatial resolution, signal background ratio (SBR), and penetration depth.…”