2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system compared to copper intrauterine device: a population-based cohort study

Abstract: The study was conducted in the context of a national pharmacovigilance follow-up for which the Centre de Pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux was appointed by the French Medicines Agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité des Médicaments, ANSM). The ANSM had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This publication represents the views of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all these events are described in the SPC. Moreover, the anxio‐depressive safety signal was found in a population‐based cohort study of the safety of the Mirena levonorgestrel IUD compared to copper IUDs and with another recent observational study …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almost all these events are described in the SPC. Moreover, the anxio‐depressive safety signal was found in a population‐based cohort study of the safety of the Mirena levonorgestrel IUD compared to copper IUDs and with another recent observational study …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Moreover, the anxio-depressive safety signal was found in a population-based cohort study of the safety of the Mirena levonorgestrel IUD compared to copper IUDs and with another recent observational study. 20,21 The media coverage peak highlighted and broadcasted information about AEs of Mirena, informing the users that their symptoms could be related to potential AEs of their levonorgestrel-releasing IUD they were unaware of. Indeed, many consumers reported long-standing symptoms, such as depression, weight gain, abdominal pain or breast tenderness, which they had not attributed previously to their levonorgestrel-releasing IUD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatürde rastlanan diğer çalışmalar da göz önüne alındığında genellikle LNG-RİS'in benzer yaş ortalamasında uygulandığı görülmektedir. (20) www.turkishfamilyphysician.com ile %65 arasında değişmekte olup, bunlar daha çok sayıda katılımcı ile yapılmış araştırmalardır. (22,23,24) Kullanıcı sayısının azlığı verilerin yorumlanmasını sınırlamaktadır.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Figure 4B) and Mirena™ (Bayer, Whippany, NJ; Figure 4C)) are physical devices incorporating a slow releasing progestin (levonorgestrel), which in addition to contraception, are commonly used in the management of dysfunctional uterine bleeding, pelvic pain disorders and to counter the effects of oestrogen-base hormonal replacement therapies. 8 Although unlikely, IUCD/IUS can displace causing them to become ineffective as a contraceptive and risk uterine perforation 9,10 (Figure 5). IUCD/IUS devices should be located entirely within the uterine cavity with the barrel straight in a cranial/caudal position and the 'T' bars located at the fundal cavity with each side positioned towards the cornua (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Mullerian Duct Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%